Active Users:1120 Time:23/11/2024 12:14:44 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM
I approve. =) I still think my comments made more sense than you gave them credit, but I accept your argument as better logic than mine. Well done... I think we can safely lay Asmodean reincarnation/reappearance aside as a possibility.
Former wotmaniac Rand al`Thor, 2001-2009. RIP wotmania...
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1655 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 632 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 702 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 335 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 612 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 641 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 750 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 700 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 655 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 563 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 552 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 570 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 578 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 572 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 529 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 612 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 563 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 580 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 557 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 534 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 597 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 571 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 568 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 654 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 637 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 609 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 494 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 568 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 509 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 563 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 578 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 612 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 485 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 484 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 529 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 590 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 308 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 471 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 617 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 298 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 506 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 285 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 553 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 283 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 553 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 499 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 584 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 541 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 539 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 290 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 262 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 241 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 525 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 543 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 538 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 495 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 521 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 287 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 499 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 278 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 504 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 237 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes