Active Users:371 Time:17/04/2025 11:35:27 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Logical? Naiowen Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM
Sorry, no. That's not logical. Just because we haven't seen Graendal reveal herself as the killer does not mean that she did not kill Asmodean. As has been stated, TGS and ToM may run paralell for a time so we don't know anything for sure.

Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1741 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 714 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 785 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 371 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 702 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 725 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 835 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 791 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 737 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 623 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 637 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 657 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 658 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 667 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 622 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 703 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 647 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 662 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 644 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 625 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 682 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 653 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 663 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 745 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 696 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 702 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 620 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 660 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 595 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 663 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 668 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 699 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 565 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 561 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 616 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 672 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 344 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 562 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 694 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 331 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 591 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 313 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 642 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 323 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 655 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 580 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 673 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 619 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 625 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 329 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 299 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 280 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 614 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 634 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 626 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 579 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 611 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 324 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 590 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 314 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 595 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 273 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes