Active Users:374 Time:12/04/2025 04:21:31 AM
Re: Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM
Graendal cannot comment later that she killed Asmodean if she is dead by balefire.

There is a theory out there that we might see Asmodean reappear in the series, based on the assumption that Graendal could have been burnt out far enough back to undo Asmodean's death.

The logic goes like this:

1. No character has yet revealed themselves as Asmodean's killer.
2. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer because she died by balefire.
3. The only possible way to still implicate Graendal as Asmodean's killer is if somehow Asmodean were to reappear in the series (i.e. if Graendal were the killer and she was balefired back far enough, then Asmo might reappear)
4. Because Brandon says it is impossible to burn Graendal out that far back, it is impossible the balefiring of Graendal will cause Asmodean to reappear.
5. Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).

Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1740 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 712 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 784 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 370 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 700 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 725 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 833 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 790 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 734 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 622 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 637 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 656 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 653 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 665 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 621 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 701 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 647 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 661 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 642 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 623 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 681 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 653 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 660 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 744 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 694 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 701 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 618 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 658 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 696 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 559 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 558 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 614 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 672 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 343 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 692 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 331 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 591 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 640 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 321 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 653 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 578 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 673 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 618 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 624 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 299 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 279 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 634 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 625 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 577 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 610 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 323 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 589 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 272 Views

Reply to Message