Active Users:1082 Time:01/11/2024 04:10:52 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Why? Naiowen Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM
How does this take Graendal out of the running for being Asmodean's killer? Just because she was balefired? Asmo's death happened months ago so Graendal being balefired would have no effect on Asmodean's death if she was the killer.

And I'm not saying I believe that she's the killer, but the logic here is mystifying.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1644 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 626 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 694 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 332 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 599 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 631 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 741 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 687 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 648 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 556 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 543 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 564 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 570 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 565 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 522 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 602 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 557 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 573 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 545 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 528 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 587 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 562 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 562 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 648 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 626 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 602 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 486 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 562 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 501 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 555 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 570 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 604 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 479 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 477 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 520 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 578 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 304 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 464 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 610 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 290 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 500 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 281 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 546 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 278 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 545 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 492 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 574 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 534 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 532 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 287 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 257 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 238 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 512 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 528 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 533 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 488 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 516 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 281 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 492 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 274 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 498 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 232 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes