Active Users:1306 Time:19/12/2024 09:10:12 AM
Nuclear weapons were only deployed when ONE country had them. Never since. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 06:15:23 AM
However, channelers are like nuclear weapons-it seems very dangerous to have them running around dozens of different nations without any international system of restraint. The AOL was the apotheosis of humankind, where it seems a utopian society recognized the Power's use and that the people of the age were in accordance (as well as war being essentially forgotten before Mierin broke the bore). Egwene's age is not so promising in outlook for benevolent channeling without something to the effect of the Three Oaths. The AS ARE weaker than Wise Ones and the Seafolk, and shouldn't be trusted without oaths or leashes-oaths preferrably.
Who needs to trust them, if you have the means to fight them? The Aes Sedai can get away with anything they want regardless of what Oaths they swear. With their monopoly on the One Power, who can stop their elite warriors with enhanced abilities from killing anyone they want dead? And if someone dares to resist the assault of a warder and defends himself, the sister is freed of all restraint by the Oath to kill her target. The Oath against lying does not make them more honest, it only protects them from the consequences of dishonesty - disbelief. No one can ignore or refute an Aes Sedai who wants to make people believe the truth, no matter how severely she has abused people's trust in the past. As for the weapon Oaths, they protects the Tower more than anyone else, because it effectively prevents the Aes Sedai from giving genuine aid to their allies, and allowing them to claim credit for anything they want. Side A has an Aes Sedai advisor, Side B has an Aes Sedai lying low in their camp in secret. Side A wins, the Aes Sedai takes all the credit for her timely advice, and implies the sister found in Side B's tent was actually working with her to hand the victory to Side A. 'No, we can't give you details! Aes Sedai do not use the Power as a weapon, so we must work subtly behind the scenes, and such methods must remain secret.' Or if Side B wins, it HAS to be through the machinations of their secret Aes Sedai counselor. How else could they have defeated Side A which had an Aes Sedai openly working with them? See above re: the methods used to aid Side B.
The final Oath, against making weapons, is also for the benefit of the Tower in another way - it prevents any sister from making anything that would give normal people a way to oppose the Tower, such as happened in Seanchan.

Don't go looking at the Oaths like they protect the world from dangerous channelers. The only real protection is other channelers who are ready to take down a potentially abusive channeler to gain credit or advantages over the bad channeler's organization. Channeler running amuck? Have the local magistrate whistle up a detachment from the National Channeler Corps to deal with the problem, or hire a channeler from Channeling Associates LLC. to protect your town from him. Presumably people could also hire out defenses from such a source. Channelers could weave alarm wards around homes, or ward farms against vermin or weeds, or fire-retardant wards or any number of things. When there is profit involved, there is no limit to what human ingenuity can provide. The more diverse the channeling entities are, the less chance there is for any one to oppress people. And when the channelers are not a monolithic organization with oppressive clout, they can't use their influence to punish ordinary people who manage to defy their edicts with an arrow in the back or a knife in the dark.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
/Miscellaneous: A better ending to the Tower struggle? - 11/11/2009 03:30:40 AM 1319 Views
Re: /Miscellaneous: A better ending to the Tower struggle? - 11/11/2009 04:00:00 AM 538 Views
Personal aside re: Egwene - 11/11/2009 04:08:46 AM 714 Views
Re: Personal aside re: Egwene - 11/11/2009 04:29:58 AM 538 Views
Nuclear weapons were only deployed when ONE country had them. Never since. - 11/11/2009 06:15:23 AM 536 Views
This is a ridiculously idealistic viewpoint... - 11/11/2009 06:31:14 AM 651 Views
Re: This is a ridiculously idealistic viewpoint... - 11/11/2009 08:35:07 AM 562 Views
The World is messy - 11/11/2009 06:42:16 AM 482 Views
And without a structure, how much damage can any individual do? - 11/11/2009 08:40:53 AM 506 Views
I must say... - 11/11/2009 06:00:18 AM 642 Views
Cannoli is the Perez Hilton of WoT. Pretty obvious. - 11/11/2009 06:11:45 AM 622 Views
You're being absurd! - 11/11/2009 07:44:06 AM 780 Views
Rhuidean? - 11/11/2009 08:05:43 AM 502 Views
Re: Rhuidean? - 11/11/2009 08:42:37 AM 543 Views
I think that Cannoli is the Man, but... - 13/11/2009 02:30:03 PM 458 Views
If I recall correctly- those were the last of the 'true' Aes Sedai. - 11/11/2009 06:02:38 PM 536 Views
Actually the BWB or RJ said no AoL Aes Sedai survived the Breaking. - 12/11/2009 02:32:36 AM 480 Views
The Aes Sedai in Rhuidean may have been an exception - 12/11/2009 04:15:32 AM 441 Views
Also, "The Breaking" lasted a long time - 12/11/2009 07:16:57 AM 432 Views
Technically, the Breaking ended when the last Male AS died, so female AS could survive past it *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:42:01 PM 197 Views
Yes, but they did not. *NM* - 13/11/2009 03:50:18 PM 216 Views
The thing is ... - 11/11/2009 06:05:58 AM 570 Views
Agree and Disagree - 11/11/2009 06:30:54 AM 444 Views
We can hope... but I honestly don't see it happening. It's complicated. - 11/11/2009 06:47:27 AM 581 Views
You might be right but... - 11/11/2009 07:08:19 AM 491 Views
Re: You might be right but... - 12/11/2009 06:37:48 PM 448 Views
You answered your own question - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 AM 460 Views
It wouldn's work in the westlands - 11/11/2009 01:13:54 PM 454 Views
Anyone passing the Accepted Test must believe in a WT supremacy, - 11/11/2009 01:45:25 PM 462 Views

Reply to Message