Active Users:868 Time:15/11/2024 11:33:32 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: I thought only one sa/angreal can be used by a channeler at a time, so no double dipping PatAtt Send a noteboard - 10/11/2009 04:53:44 PM
This can't be true. When fighting Asmodean, Rand uses both the Choedan Kal and the fat man angreal.
This message last edited by PatAtt on 10/11/2009 at 05:16:20 PM
Reply to message
Egwene and Vora's sa'angreal (some very minor spoilers) Erim - 09/11/2009 09:09:18 PM 2496 Views
Interesting point Sidious - 09/11/2009 09:25:53 PM 1089 Views
Maybe that's the greater difference between angreal and sa'angreal *NM* Voscaia Sedai - 09/11/2009 09:35:33 PM 334 Views
I think sa'angreal are so powerful that even with a marginal Circle, it created an awesome reservoir RugbyPlayingAshaman - 09/11/2009 10:02:14 PM 721 Views
That does not necessarily prove the novices are affected - they can sense the amount of the Power Cannoli - 10/11/2009 01:04:10 AM 903 Views
It's not real proof, true Sidious - 10/11/2009 07:22:53 AM 682 Views
This occurs because it is a sa'angreal PatAtt - 10/11/2009 05:13:01 PM 888 Views
Thank you. Your explanation is also coroborated by events at the Bowl of the Wind Logain - 10/11/2009 05:56:59 PM 808 Views
Re: This occurs because it is a sa'angreal Rurouni_Kenshin - 12/11/2009 02:11:23 PM 768 Views
Re: This occurs because it is a sa'angreal taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 04:35:17 PM 664 Views
She Led the Circle. The Name With No Man - 16/11/2009 02:37:55 PM 791 Views
It's unclear what the forkroot would affect. Gher - 09/11/2009 10:20:11 PM 694 Views
That "mistake" is in character for Egwene. You have the dream ter'angreal wrong, BTW. Cannoli - 10/11/2009 01:24:14 AM 951 Views
Huh. Sidious - 10/11/2009 07:21:21 AM 718 Views
I thought only one sa/angreal can be used by a channeler at a time, so no double dipping *NM* redhand - 10/11/2009 02:20:54 PM 328 Views
Re: I thought only one sa/angreal can be used by a channeler at a time, so no double dipping PatAtt - 10/11/2009 04:53:44 PM 612 Views
technically, it is an angreal and a ter'angreal, so not two sa/angreal *NM* redhand - 10/11/2009 09:32:20 PM 309 Views
technically it's an angreal, sa'angreal and ter'angreal *NM* Sidious - 11/11/2009 07:35:14 AM 332 Views
The twisted ring Maresu - 10/11/2009 01:17:23 PM 665 Views
Re: The twisted ring darius_sedai - 29/11/2009 05:17:27 PM 580 Views
Re: Egwene and Vora's sa'angreal (some very minor spoilers) fairfax - 10/11/2009 01:44:46 AM 959 Views
Re: Egwene and Vora's sa'angreal (some very minor spoilers) echooff - 10/11/2009 01:57:50 PM 673 Views
The way I got it was Ryan - 10/11/2009 03:38:20 PM 643 Views
Re: Egwene and Vora's sa'angreal (some very minor spoilers) darius_sedai - 29/11/2009 05:25:54 PM 806 Views
Novices are likely to overdraw if given such a fount of power. *NM* Lord Haart - 25/11/2009 08:35:10 AM 312 Views
Re: Egwene and Vora's sa'angreal (some very minor spoilers) taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 04:36:29 PM 787 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes