Active Users:912 Time:15/11/2024 04:59:44 PM
What? Sidious Send a noteboard - 05/11/2009 07:23:40 AM
Who inspire almost no fear at all. The other Forsaken, Rand and others like Brigitte just remark that she is a clever manipulator. But no one fears her, like Demandred or Semirhage for example. And that is precisely what Graendal wants by her flamboyant and over the top behaviour & appearance.


What! She inspires a great deal of fear. The Forsaken portray her as the deadliest of enemies who hides behind a veil of hedonism. When she snarls at Lanfear in FoH, Rahvin actually gets scared and prepares to Travel. When she threatens to kill Sammael, Moridin tenses and even Sammael gets affronted.

Asmo's reaction doesn't fit at all with seeing Graendal. And that Graendal would confront Asmo and immediately kill him, also doesn't fit at all with what we know about her: Graendal wouldn't risk to go to Caemlyn in the first place, and if she went their, only with a disguise, and if she met Asmo, she would use Compulsion on him to gather informations or use him as a tool, not kill him.


She would indeed risk it - she's been all over the place. We know that she's been to Shara and the White Tower, and she's adept at Illusion and disguise. She could easily kill him - she's considered killing Sammael on the spot twice, even from her own PoV. Why would Graendal toy with Compulsion if she suddenly came face to face with a male Forsaken who recognised her as an enemy? She's be a shocked as him, and would instantly lash out.

But it's anyway moot, because TGS made even more clear that Graendal wasn't Asmo's killer. Otherwise BS could have revealed it in her last PoV.


I can't believe you think that. It's as if the only way he could reveal the assassination would be from the killer's own mouth.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
So...who is Demandred disguised as and who do you think killed Asmodean NOW? - 02/11/2009 07:03:38 PM 3064 Views
Hmm - 02/11/2009 08:34:40 PM 968 Views
I think that Graendal did it. Why? - 02/11/2009 10:24:13 PM 935 Views
Re: I think that Graendal did it. Why? - 02/11/2009 11:55:56 PM 906 Views
Considering that the Forsaken attend meetings together... - 03/11/2009 12:18:05 AM 803 Views
After 2nd thought.... I can easily see Demandred's troops being in Seanchan - 03/11/2009 02:36:22 AM 833 Views
I don't think so - 03/11/2009 04:14:25 AM 904 Views
Well, it definitely is a wildcard theory - 03/11/2009 07:01:37 AM 781 Views
Demandred's in Shara - 03/11/2009 07:32:25 AM 977 Views
I think Shara is pretty much irrelevant to the series. - 03/11/2009 01:43:59 PM 770 Views
Murandy seems the best guess for Demandred... - 03/11/2009 10:10:54 AM 894 Views
Re: Murandy seems the best guess for Demandred... - 03/11/2009 10:33:51 AM 1898 Views
Yeah... - 03/11/2009 10:50:05 AM 805 Views
Re: Yeah... - 03/11/2009 12:36:18 PM 818 Views
Re: Yeah... - 03/11/2009 01:43:17 PM 790 Views
Hmmm.... - 04/11/2009 10:45:01 AM 790 Views
Indeed - 04/11/2009 11:05:18 AM 813 Views
Graendal is one of those Forsaken... - 04/11/2009 11:50:20 AM 771 Views
What? - 05/11/2009 07:23:40 AM 729 Views
Graendal... - 05/11/2009 09:59:53 AM 973 Views
Re: Graendal... - 05/11/2009 02:52:49 PM 790 Views
Re: Graendal's last POV - 05/11/2009 03:59:44 PM 711 Views
Re: Graendal's last POV - 08/12/2009 05:06:52 AM 618 Views
Hmmm again.... - 04/11/2009 12:05:42 PM 776 Views
- 05/11/2009 02:53:54 PM 612 Views
Murandy is a tiny, worthless nation - 03/11/2009 01:46:28 PM 1200 Views
I think... - 03/11/2009 03:02:03 PM 796 Views
Re: I think... - 03/11/2009 03:47:19 PM 766 Views
Re: I think... - 03/11/2009 04:19:54 PM 648 Views
Katerine was still there at the time of the Seanchan attack - 03/11/2009 03:03:53 PM 720 Views
Well... - 03/11/2009 03:25:13 PM 873 Views
Hmmm. Don't care about either answer lol! - 08/11/2009 08:48:12 PM 722 Views
Demandred uses proxies - 22/11/2009 01:09:40 PM 757 Views
Don't forget that Demandred could be controlling the 200K borderlanders. *NM* - 09/11/2009 02:53:08 PM 383 Views
Very doubtful... - 09/11/2009 03:27:49 PM 698 Views

Reply to Message