Tavi is correct above, that only the actions of those killed by Balefire are removed from the new time sequence. Of course, there's room to prod and push the logic around this to contrive a paradox, and it's better to just let these things be and not think about it too much.
If you were to follow your line of reasoning, then Graendal ceased to exist before Rand actually balefired her, so how could he have balefired her?
If you were to follow your line of reasoning, then Graendal ceased to exist before Rand actually balefired her, so how could he have balefired her?
Continuity errors
29/10/2009 04:36:00 PM
- 1600 Views
Min's bruises
29/10/2009 05:37:01 PM
- 892 Views
Re: Min's bruises
29/10/2009 06:18:13 PM
- 851 Views
sorry doesn't work that way
30/10/2009 02:30:00 AM
- 803 Views
I'd be careful about going down that line of reasoning, though...
31/10/2009 09:52:19 PM
- 664 Views
You can control how far back the balefire burns.
01/11/2009 07:42:29 PM
- 648 Views
Rand actually killed Min
15/11/2009 07:00:48 PM
- 734 Views
No, it's said that she gasps inbetween the letting go of her and the balefire. *NM*
15/11/2009 08:27:53 PM
- 315 Views
This is not a continuity error
03/11/2009 01:57:16 AM
- 667 Views
Traveling would have required her to know where she was going.
15/11/2009 12:39:10 PM
- 629 Views
Burn it!
30/10/2009 01:56:17 AM
- 1249 Views
It could be just me, but "for Light's sake" was a new one to me, too...
31/10/2009 09:55:17 PM
- 597 Views