Active Users:1002 Time:24/09/2026 08:24:34 PM
There are a couple of flaws in your theory beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 03/11/2009 01:47:39 AM
First, polygamy isn't presented as immoral in WoT- only a bit of culture shock. The normal objections that are often brought against polygamy in our world- abuse, child brides, gender inequality, all of that- don't really apply here.* For the Aiel, there's nothing immoral about 2 wives and a husband, and the examples we've seen have shown that their system is at least as stable as monogamy.

*They don't always apply IRL, either- I know happy, healthy polygamous relationships. But that's neither here nor there.

So, there's no moral imperative to make Rand be with only one woman. And honestly, comparing Rand's odd situation to Rahvin and Graendal mind-raping people doesn't really make sense.


Second, you think that Min, Elayne and Avidendha will merge to be one person? And that this is a GOOD thing? Three discrete individuals, each with their own memories, thoughts and personalities, merged together? Ick.

There are similar things- Rand and LTT, Mat's memories, and the mirrored emotions of Elayne/Birgitte's Warder bond. But Mat only got some memories, and Elayne only sometimes feels Birgitte's emotions- much different than actually BECOMING the same person. Rand and LTT have a bit of the merging thing going on, but it's been presented as NOT a good thing, an insane dead man taking over his body at worst, a ranting voice in his mind at best.

A "merging" of Avidenha, Elayne and Min would NOT be a happy or "moral" ending.

I amuse myself.
Reply to message
tGS - the three shall be one - 02/11/2009 11:52:12 PM 3966 Views
Callandor + Rand + Avihenda + Elayne = Safe usage of Callandor. *NM* - 03/11/2009 01:11:26 AM 1009 Views
Not in this place - 03/11/2009 11:33:44 PM 1222 Views
Min is irrelavent to the passage. - 05/11/2009 01:03:33 AM 1264 Views
Re: Min always matters... - 05/11/2009 09:41:06 AM 1398 Views
*** *NM* - 08/12/2009 03:01:52 PM 576 Views
This is the new most insane theory I've ever read *NM* - 03/11/2009 01:30:43 AM 653 Views
Re: This is the new most insane theory I've ever read - 03/11/2009 04:06:03 PM 1316 Views
Re: This is the new most insane theory I've ever read - 04/11/2009 12:21:10 AM 1737 Views
Thank you Rand ... - 04/11/2009 02:51:10 PM 2003 Views
sorry, this post (not post above!) should be deleted *NM* - 04/11/2009 04:13:32 PM 581 Views
I do not know how to delete my own post *NM* - 05/11/2009 09:46:34 AM 598 Views
I think only admins can delete posts. *NM* - 08/12/2009 03:26:47 PM 569 Views
Re: Thank you Rand ... - 10/11/2009 10:18:57 PM 1145 Views
this makes sense - 14/11/2009 07:42:13 AM 1242 Views
There are a couple of flaws in your theory - 03/11/2009 01:47:39 AM 1337 Views
monogomy, actually - 03/11/2009 02:01:16 AM 1268 Views
I first read this as Rand, LTT and Moridin merging into one. - 03/11/2009 02:16:48 AM 1240 Views
that's actually plausible *NM* - 03/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 580 Views
It might also mean... - 03/11/2009 03:49:10 AM 1240 Views
The three ta'veren is more plausible *NM* - 03/11/2009 08:05:37 AM 557 Views
I agree, although I don't think they'll physicall merge *NM* - 03/11/2009 09:30:43 PM 577 Views
Re: I first read this as Rand, LTT and Moridin merging into one. - 03/11/2009 01:34:17 PM 1235 Views
Everything might happen... - 04/11/2009 04:29:16 PM 1282 Views
NM *NM* - 05/11/2009 06:29:42 PM 567 Views
... - 07/11/2009 12:28:33 PM 1024 Views
What about the three ta'veren? *NM* - 07/11/2009 08:43:58 PM 535 Views
Re: What about the three ta'veren? - 08/11/2009 03:20:53 PM 1365 Views
All true posibilities... - 10/11/2009 09:40:30 AM 1036 Views
Re: All true posibilities... - 11/11/2009 06:14:54 PM 1298 Views
Thought this for awhile - 09/11/2009 01:18:22 AM 1293 Views
Its nirvana, not nirvani! - 09/11/2009 01:26:30 AM 1321 Views
You forgot Bela and Narg. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:04:30 PM 676 Views
Really? Wenches? *NM* - 29/11/2009 07:12:07 AM 588 Views

Reply to Message