Active Users:1286 Time:23/11/2024 06:37:58 AM
Several valid points... Legolas Send a noteboard - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
but for me personally, and I think for a lot of people, those points are not sufficient to justify the practice. I do agree that it would be unreasonable to expect the Seanchan to immediately give up the practice, considering your points but on the other hand it would be equally unreasonable to expect the Aes Sedai (or Aiel, or Seafolk) to be okay with them doing it. And it certainly is something that makes it harder to cheer for them - it's entirely intentional, of course, that RJ and now Sanderson keep harping on how solid rulers the Seanchans are, how they are rather good rulers for the average citizen, at the cost of the horrible treatment of one small group of citizens. A good way of keeping them grey and keeping them from being BFFs with the main cast, I'd say - the moment Tuon gives up that stance, if she ever does, she and her whole people become much less interesting from a plot tension point of view.
Reply to message
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam? - 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM 1449 Views
Yes, but not me - 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM 712 Views
Re: Yes, but not me - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM 655 Views
I hated him - 31/10/2009 12:57:52 AM 647 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM 825 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM 666 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM 699 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal - 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM 655 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM* - 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM 254 Views
The big shiney ball thing he destroyed at the end of the book - 01/11/2009 07:50:15 PM 603 Views
Destroyed. My point exactly. *NM* - 06/11/2009 04:40:16 AM 240 Views
For what? - 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM 652 Views
I dont think it's compulsion. - 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM 593 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. - 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM 566 Views
He did the same thing with Cady - 31/10/2009 12:25:51 AM 580 Views
Personally, I thought he was using the TP to do those things. - 04/11/2009 07:37:31 PM 539 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM 483 Views
No - 31/10/2009 12:06:13 AM 606 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear? - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM 691 Views
You dont really get it. - 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM 539 Views
That is just POV trap - 31/10/2009 04:20:07 PM 529 Views
Flawed Argument - 31/10/2009 08:54:05 PM 526 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences. - 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM 634 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued... - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM 624 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT. - 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM 521 Views
That's complete hogwash. - 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM 572 Views
Think it through - 31/10/2009 10:25:08 PM 655 Views
I have... - 31/10/2009 11:05:20 PM 622 Views
Re: I have... - 01/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 788 Views
Well that was rather silly. - 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM 494 Views
Several valid points... - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM 584 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed - 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM 547 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be. - 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM 526 Views
^ *NM* - 31/10/2009 05:33:04 AM 232 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom - 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM 542 Views
Due to their conditioning. - 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM 556 Views
Random - 31/10/2009 10:26:34 AM 534 Views
Agreed - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM 524 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM 478 Views

Reply to Message