Active Users:493 Time:01/11/2024 03:55:31 PM
Agreed Simon Send a noteboard - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM
The idea should be abolished, and dropped into the ocean like the male a'dam was supposed to be, but the Sul'dam themselves? No.


And she refused. Therefore if the sul'dam come for channelers they should be destroyed, just like Egwene destroyed them. The sul'dam are also notoriously sadistic, probably as part of their training. The world doesn't need people like that.

Reply to message
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam? - 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM 1436 Views
Yes, but not me - 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM 703 Views
Re: Yes, but not me - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM 648 Views
I hated him - 31/10/2009 12:57:52 AM 634 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM 802 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM 654 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM 688 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal - 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM 646 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM* - 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM 249 Views
The big shiney ball thing he destroyed at the end of the book - 01/11/2009 07:50:15 PM 592 Views
Destroyed. My point exactly. *NM* - 06/11/2009 04:40:16 AM 235 Views
For what? - 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM 642 Views
I dont think it's compulsion. - 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM 582 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. - 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM 557 Views
He did the same thing with Cady - 31/10/2009 12:25:51 AM 569 Views
Personally, I thought he was using the TP to do those things. - 04/11/2009 07:37:31 PM 526 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM 470 Views
No - 31/10/2009 12:06:13 AM 596 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear? - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM 678 Views
You dont really get it. - 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM 529 Views
That is just POV trap - 31/10/2009 04:20:07 PM 522 Views
Flawed Argument - 31/10/2009 08:54:05 PM 515 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences. - 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM 621 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued... - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM 617 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT. - 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM 509 Views
That's complete hogwash. - 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM 558 Views
Think it through - 31/10/2009 10:25:08 PM 642 Views
I have... - 31/10/2009 11:05:20 PM 611 Views
Re: I have... - 01/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 775 Views
Well that was rather silly. - 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM 486 Views
Several valid points... - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM 564 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed - 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM 529 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be. - 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM 511 Views
^ *NM* - 31/10/2009 05:33:04 AM 228 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom - 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM 532 Views
Due to their conditioning. - 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM 545 Views
Random - 31/10/2009 10:26:34 AM 524 Views
Agreed - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM 515 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM 463 Views

Reply to Message