The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued...
fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM
Unless you can prove that damane will become power hungry megalomaniacs if left free, leashing them serves no purpose.
The way to handle mass murderers is not to control their ability to mass murder. It is to remove that ability completely.
If the Seanchan genuinely believe that the OP taints people who wield it, they should kill all channelers. Harnessing the channelers ability merely alters who can misuse the power. How is that a solution to the problem?
What if the White Tower created a Senachan like state in the Westlands? Ruthlessly killed all opposition, used the Power in war, used their extensive system of eyes and ears to deliver swift retribution and forced every girl who could channel to join the White Tower?
Some of that already happens, and you have harshly criticized the Tower for it. But somehow, when it is non channelers who end up wielding the Power for their purposes, its alright?
This is ridiculous hypocrisy on your part.
The way to handle mass murderers is not to control their ability to mass murder. It is to remove that ability completely.
If the Seanchan genuinely believe that the OP taints people who wield it, they should kill all channelers. Harnessing the channelers ability merely alters who can misuse the power. How is that a solution to the problem?
What if the White Tower created a Senachan like state in the Westlands? Ruthlessly killed all opposition, used the Power in war, used their extensive system of eyes and ears to deliver swift retribution and forced every girl who could channel to join the White Tower?
Some of that already happens, and you have harshly criticized the Tower for it. But somehow, when it is non channelers who end up wielding the Power for their purposes, its alright?
This is ridiculous hypocrisy on your part.
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam?
- 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM
1529 Views
Yes, but not me
- 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM
788 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM
909 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM
743 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan
- 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM
778 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal
- 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM
735 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM
287 Views
For what?
- 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM
729 Views
if he was it wasn't on purpose. I think he was just actively trying to use his ta'verenness *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:15:32 AM
294 Views
I dont think it's compulsion.
- 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM
678 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. 
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
656 Views
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
656 Views
I don't care for Tuon at all. I'd be okay if her and the Seanchan were obliterated. *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:44:22 AM
291 Views
And how is that any different from me with Egwene (except she & I are the same race)? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 04:51:17 AM
301 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear?
- 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM
779 Views
You dont really get it.
- 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM
622 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences.
- 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM
713 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued...
- 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM
711 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT.
- 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM
604 Views
That's complete hogwash.
- 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM
628 Views
Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 01/11/2009 05:44:16 AM
671 Views
Re: Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 05/11/2009 02:54:52 AM
972 Views
Well that was rather silly.
- 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM
580 Views
And a generation later, the same old problem arises. New channelers, with no one to stop them.
- 31/10/2009 10:28:35 PM
573 Views
Several valid points...
- 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
666 Views
I wonder what if Egwene happen to be a child kidnapped at Flame and sent to WT
- 31/10/2009 06:30:34 PM
665 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed
- 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM
630 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be.
- 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM
618 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom
- 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM
614 Views
Due to their conditioning.
- 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM
635 Views
She will 
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
287 Views
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
287 Views
I think the a'dam is the perfect solution for Blacks and the Shaido 'Wise Ones'.
- 01/11/2009 02:51:27 AM
680 Views