Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan
Cannoli Send a noteboard - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM
Although, I have to say I can't wait to read the Tuon point of view when her raiding party comes back and tells them about this one Aes Sedai who single handedly kicked all their asses! That should scare the heck out of her, especially if the ones she captured are able to say that was "only" a novice.
And it will take them about three seconds to learn about angreal, and they'll adapt, react and overcome. As for your previous post, maybe Rand COULD "cleanse" the Black Tower if someone could hand him a convenient list that does all the work for him, too. Here's something to consider - the Seanchan armies are USED to facing the One Power in battle. They won't crap their pants and run, they'll charge in to fight with their sul'dam and damane. What makes you think the Aes Sedai will operate in any sort of cohesive fashion to make an effective fighting force, or that the Asha'man should submit to their inferiors in combat? Note that at the Cleansing, the smallest circle which was led by an Asha'man, and a solo ex-damane were the most successful in routing the Forsaken, while the two largest circles, led by a Brown and a White, took casualties. When contemplating Aludra's dragons, Mat thinks they will be better than having channelers (who are more powerful, faster and more versatile than possibly even modern artillery) with an army, because Aes Sedai don't follow orders well, and he doesn't anticipate Asha'man being any better. Control over his channelers is vital for any general to use them effectively, and that is what the Seanchan have. A Seanchan general merely has to give an order to his sul'dam, and he gets his firepower. Rand, Mat and Perrin all have to phrase their requests nicely, hope the Aes Sedai decide to cooperate, and then wait for them to split hairs over Oath Rod technicalities. And you know they'll never agree to work with Asha'man unless they are in total control.
Given these factors, your scenario just might end rather badly for your arrogant Joint Tower deputation.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam?
30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM
- 1437 Views
Yes, but not me
30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM
- 704 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM
- 802 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM
- 656 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan
31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM
- 689 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal
31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM
- 648 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM*
31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM
- 249 Views
For what?
31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM
- 643 Views
if he was it wasn't on purpose. I think he was just actively trying to use his ta'verenness *NM*
31/10/2009 12:15:32 AM
- 257 Views
I dont think it's compulsion.
31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM
- 582 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around.
31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
- 558 Views
I don't care for Tuon at all. I'd be okay if her and the Seanchan were obliterated. *NM*
31/10/2009 12:44:22 AM
- 254 Views
And how is that any different from me with Egwene (except she & I are the same race)? *NM*
31/10/2009 04:51:17 AM
- 260 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear?
31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM
- 680 Views
You dont really get it.
31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM
- 529 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences.
31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM
- 622 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued...
31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM
- 618 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT.
31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM
- 511 Views
That's complete hogwash.
31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM
- 558 Views
Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
01/11/2009 05:44:16 AM
- 582 Views
Re: Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
05/11/2009 02:54:52 AM
- 878 Views
Well that was rather silly.
31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM
- 486 Views
And a generation later, the same old problem arises. New channelers, with no one to stop them.
31/10/2009 10:28:35 PM
- 514 Views
Several valid points...
31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
- 565 Views
I wonder what if Egwene happen to be a child kidnapped at Flame and sent to WT
31/10/2009 06:30:34 PM
- 571 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed
31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM
- 529 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be.
31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM
- 513 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom
31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM
- 532 Views
Due to their conditioning.
31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM
- 546 Views
She will (and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
- 250 Views
I think the a'dam is the perfect solution for Blacks and the Shaido 'Wise Ones'.
01/11/2009 02:51:27 AM
- 590 Views