Active Users:515 Time:01/11/2024 03:59:20 PM
Why not Highlords in Tear? redhand Send a noteboard - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM
Like really, really angry?
I found myself wanting Rand to balefire the Seanchan at the end of the book, even if it ment putting up with another 20 chapters of Rand being broody and the same in Cady trying to make him smile. Just some kind of retribution for it.

It's really begining to get to me. I now really dislike Tuon and want someone to beat her down, I would give everything I had to see her leashed to Egwene for a few minutes, hell I'd even take that scenario with Elaida at the end.
Normally things dont get to me much in books, I can sit back and watch injustice, bullying, stupidity and not get emotionally implicated, but these, there is something about them. Ever since we saw Ewgene suffer at the end of ones of these I've just had a hatred of them ingrained.

Am I the only one?



The Highlords in Tear can do what seanchan did to channelers to any commoners, any day before Rand arrived. The Whitecloaks can declare any regular folk darkfriends and do the same thing. They did this in Almoth Plain and the TR. The only main difference is that for Seanchan, it is quite visible. For the WC, the prisoner stay in the dungeon and no one can see their suffering.

You only have this reaction since you see no POV from a commoner in Tear, and has not see any POV from WC prisoner since Perrin's capture.

As Stalin said, one death is a tragedy, one million is a statistics. Seanchan is just more honest about it.
Reply to message
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam? - 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM 1436 Views
Yes, but not me - 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM 704 Views
Re: Yes, but not me - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM 649 Views
I hated him - 31/10/2009 12:57:52 AM 635 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM 802 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM 656 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM 688 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal - 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM 647 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM* - 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM 249 Views
The big shiney ball thing he destroyed at the end of the book - 01/11/2009 07:50:15 PM 593 Views
Destroyed. My point exactly. *NM* - 06/11/2009 04:40:16 AM 235 Views
For what? - 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM 643 Views
I dont think it's compulsion. - 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM 582 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. - 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM 558 Views
He did the same thing with Cady - 31/10/2009 12:25:51 AM 570 Views
Personally, I thought he was using the TP to do those things. - 04/11/2009 07:37:31 PM 526 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM 470 Views
No - 31/10/2009 12:06:13 AM 597 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear? - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM 679 Views
You dont really get it. - 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM 529 Views
That is just POV trap - 31/10/2009 04:20:07 PM 522 Views
Flawed Argument - 31/10/2009 08:54:05 PM 515 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences. - 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM 621 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued... - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM 617 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT. - 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM 509 Views
That's complete hogwash. - 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM 558 Views
Think it through - 31/10/2009 10:25:08 PM 642 Views
I have... - 31/10/2009 11:05:20 PM 612 Views
Re: I have... - 01/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 776 Views
Well that was rather silly. - 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM 486 Views
Several valid points... - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM 564 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed - 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM 529 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be. - 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM 511 Views
^ *NM* - 31/10/2009 05:33:04 AM 228 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom - 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM 532 Views
Due to their conditioning. - 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM 545 Views
Random - 31/10/2009 10:26:34 AM 524 Views
Agreed - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM 515 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM 464 Views

Reply to Message