Active Users:716 Time:25/11/2024 03:49:49 AM
Re: I have no objections. Watcher Send a noteboard - 21/10/2009 07:51:28 PM
It would make sense that the test is keyed to the abilities and strenght of the Accepted taking it. The Tower would love to have every candidate to be forsaken strength channelers but that is not going to happen.

An Aes Sedai needs to be a minimum strenght otherwise she does not get called for the test. Once that minimum strenght level is reached I think that the Tower want to be sure that the would be Aes Sedai can deal with pressure, react calmly in a crises and multi task.

I would imagine that its also to give the candidates a sense of self assurance. After surviving a life or death situation you would be better armed emotionally to deal with some petty noble giving you grief or take charge of a gang of merchants squabbling over some trade issue. If you have been through the fire and survived I would guess that minor crises registere exactly as that - minor in comparison and you are not overwhelmed by the problem.

That being said I wonder how Shemerin managed to pass the test?
Reply to message
My thoughts on the difficulty of the test to become Aes Sedai - 21/10/2009 05:52:43 PM 1121 Views
You are correct *NM* - 21/10/2009 06:40:53 PM 276 Views
I have no objections. - 21/10/2009 06:49:53 PM 762 Views
Re: I have no objections. - 21/10/2009 07:51:28 PM 669 Views
Why is Elaida always there??? *NM* - 21/10/2009 08:09:37 PM 353 Views
Always, as in, the ONE time we have ever seen the test? *NM* - 21/10/2009 10:26:30 PM 280 Views
She was there for Moiraine's AS test, and... Egwene's Accepted one. - 21/10/2009 11:28:40 PM 602 Views
Personal interest in Moiraine & Elayne. That reason was cited in tDR - they used the same sisters *NM* - 22/10/2009 11:22:37 AM 275 Views
But Elayne was tested at the same time as Egwene. - 22/10/2009 05:56:34 PM 618 Views
She was there for Elayne's - 22/10/2009 10:26:54 PM 678 Views
Yeah, so 100% of the time as far as we've seen. *NM* - 21/10/2009 11:39:57 PM 268 Views
I guess a more subtle question I was trying to get at was - 22/10/2009 02:05:36 AM 623 Views
Re: I guess a more subtle question I was trying to get at was - 22/10/2009 03:58:09 AM 614 Views
It'd make sense - 22/10/2009 06:23:41 AM 539 Views
Yeah. - 21/10/2009 10:26:08 PM 659 Views
I agree, and would like to potentially add something - 22/10/2009 01:53:22 AM 703 Views

Reply to Message