Active Users:652 Time:15/11/2024 11:00:58 AM
Overall? No. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 18/10/2009 06:04:21 PM
He'll lead the Whitecloaks. That's about it. Oh, and maybe become a king.

When I think of the major roles, I tend to think of the characters that accomplish things that push the story forward. Galad, for the most part, has not been one of these characters...he seems to be pushed by the momentum of events rather than a combination of his own determination and the movement of the story. So I don't necessarily think kings, queens, VIPs, t'a'veren and etc have major roles - Perrin is a t'a'averen, for example, and next to Verin, Cadsuane or Lan, he really hasn't done anything of note.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 18/10/2009 at 07:03:06 PM
Reply to message
Galad is being underestimated - 18/10/2009 07:16:11 AM 976 Views
He will definitely play a larger role, but his troop size currently is minor - 18/10/2009 07:51:38 AM 662 Views
Perrin has unfinished business with the Whitecloaks - 18/10/2009 08:53:51 AM 821 Views
that should end the stupid, boring Morgase arc too *NM* - 18/10/2009 09:53:04 AM 292 Views
yes, I think he has a larger role - 18/10/2009 09:56:41 AM 673 Views
Re: yes, I think he has a larger role - 18/10/2009 10:10:46 AM 585 Views
Re: yes, I think he has a larger role - 18/10/2009 10:51:58 AM 640 Views
And the notorious one - 18/10/2009 06:32:28 PM 563 Views
Re: yes, I think he has a larger role - 18/10/2009 08:44:59 PM 552 Views
Overall? No. - 18/10/2009 06:04:21 PM 589 Views

Reply to Message