I don't think he'd have considered it at all without this aspect.
Joel Send a noteboard - 12/10/2009 12:45:26 AM
That the DO could theoretically transmigrate the soul of a balefired person, if the amount of balefire was very small. We don't know exactly, though, if Moiraine's balefire was such a "very small amount".
Besides that, this information only came from a Tor Q&A outside the books. For a "normal" reader, who just knows the books, it's a rule that the DO can't transmigrate a person, who was balefired. It would be very sloppy writing, if RJ suddenly reveals in one of the last books that a balefired person can be transmigrated, without indicating at all in the books that this is possible (but actually stating that this isn't possible). And if it's supposed to besome twist, RJ certainly wouldn't already give it away in a Q&A.
Therefore I believe the "very small amount of balefire"-exception to the transmigration-rule is just an academical information by RJ for interested fans; it isn't supposed to hint at a transmigration of Be'lal.
Besides that, this information only came from a Tor Q&A outside the books. For a "normal" reader, who just knows the books, it's a rule that the DO can't transmigrate a person, who was balefired. It would be very sloppy writing, if RJ suddenly reveals in one of the last books that a balefired person can be transmigrated, without indicating at all in the books that this is possible (but actually stating that this isn't possible). And if it's supposed to besome twist, RJ certainly wouldn't already give it away in a Q&A.
Therefore I believe the "very small amount of balefire"-exception to the transmigration-rule is just an academical information by RJ for interested fans; it isn't supposed to hint at a transmigration of Be'lal.
I don't think it would be sloppy writing anymore than allowing Forsaken to be resurrected; that was a helluva lot more unexpected, don't you think? That's kind of the point of such things. I don't think Jordan would deliberately give it away in an interview, but if he's directly asked, what can he do, really? "RAFO"? That's tantamount to saying, "yes. " If it's not possible there's no reason not to say so, and that it is, that he's even bothered to consider it, suggests to me that Taim is Be'lal.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Dueling Theory II: Taim is Be'lal.
- 07/10/2009 03:37:59 PM
1034 Views
I've always found this to be a silly theory
- 07/10/2009 03:49:53 PM
721 Views
Still like it though.
- 07/10/2009 03:55:47 PM
566 Views
Not possible
- 07/10/2009 06:44:04 PM
520 Views
*NM*
RJ actually indicated...
- 10/10/2009 10:51:23 AM
482 Views
I don't think he'd have considered it at all without this aspect.
- 12/10/2009 12:45:26 AM
485 Views
Nope...
- 07/10/2009 04:09:52 PM
544 Views
Good points, but still not convinced.
- 07/10/2009 04:19:42 PM
520 Views
The other Forsaken...
- 07/10/2009 04:31:26 PM
518 Views
Except for mentions of the fellow pretending to be Sammael.
- 07/10/2009 04:56:11 PM
747 Views
And why..
- 07/10/2009 05:25:30 PM
535 Views
Honestly, I do think Graendal was posing as Sammael, but we can't know for sure.
- 12/10/2009 12:58:58 AM
613 Views
timing doesn't fit
- 08/10/2009 01:03:01 AM
498 Views