Active Users:1245 Time:12/09/2026 10:37:52 AM
The Real Red Herring Mat_Cauthon33 Send a noteboard - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM
"Taim's character also doesn't fit Be'lal's, e.g. Taim doesn't like swords.

I've always thought that was a red herring; after Be'lals remark to Rand about how "they" turned a game of swords into combat it would be pretty stupid to immediately appear a master swordsman as well as master channeler. In fact, if he used the sword much around Rand he'd HAVE to deliberately alter his style to avoid outing himself if he's Be'lal."

Wouldnt suddently introducing Taim as Be'lal after several books of giving proof he is dead be more of a red herring than Taim not wanting to use a sword in case Rand figures out he is Be'lal?
Reply to message
Dueling Theory II: Taim is Be'lal. - 07/10/2009 03:37:59 PM 1345 Views
I've always found this to be a silly theory - 07/10/2009 03:49:53 PM 1053 Views
Still like it though. - 07/10/2009 03:55:47 PM 870 Views
I hate it like I hate Gawyn - 07/10/2009 06:17:40 PM 882 Views
Wow. - 12/10/2009 04:44:27 AM 799 Views
Not possible - 07/10/2009 06:44:04 PM 839 Views
You replied in the wrong place *NM* - 07/10/2009 07:42:14 PM 353 Views
RJ actually indicated... - 10/10/2009 10:51:23 AM 791 Views
Nope... - 07/10/2009 04:09:52 PM 814 Views
Good points, but still not convinced. - 07/10/2009 04:19:42 PM 809 Views
The other Forsaken... - 07/10/2009 04:31:26 PM 820 Views
Except for mentions of the fellow pretending to be Sammael. - 07/10/2009 04:56:11 PM 1074 Views
And why.. - 07/10/2009 05:25:30 PM 842 Views
The Real Red Herring - 07/10/2009 09:28:01 PM 939 Views
No, Taims disdain for swords is a red herring for RAND. - 12/10/2009 01:02:30 AM 844 Views
A few seconds is the same as a few hours, in this situation - 07/10/2009 11:05:25 PM 816 Views
Not at all. - 11/10/2009 11:59:14 PM 762 Views
timing doesn't fit - 08/10/2009 01:03:01 AM 796 Views
Re: timing doesn't fit - 12/10/2009 12:42:24 AM 779 Views
actually we know that's when they first come back - 12/10/2009 02:34:59 AM 930 Views

Reply to Message