Active Users:405 Time:23/11/2024 09:54:47 AM
I'd like you to clear this up... Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.


I'd like evidence that severing requires precision weaving. Not that I'm sure what precision weaving is either. Is this about that female-strength bit?

Also, are you saying there's no evidence that women weaker than Egwene or Elayne can sever channelers? 'Cause that'd be pretty ridiculous. Not only have the Tower been severing people long before channelers of the wondergirls' strength level came along, but if you count the illegal gentling of men following the Aiel War, you have typical pre-EotW strength women severing male channelers (typically stronger than the average women, to say nothing of 'Morgase or Sorilea' and surely without a large circle - there is no way that you could gather, say, thirteen extremist Reds together outside the Tower any time you wanted to perform an illegal gentling.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 1979 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 583 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 306 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 735 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 960 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1087 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 690 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1253 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 708 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 272 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 983 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 571 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 594 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 540 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 591 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 656 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 661 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 562 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 579 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 637 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 571 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 624 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 773 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 666 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 606 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 701 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 691 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 760 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 571 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 796 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 645 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1324 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 668 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 747 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1257 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 578 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 682 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1354 Views

Reply to Message