Active Users:340 Time:05/04/2025 06:03:50 PM
It's real stilling Sidious Send a noteboard - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
I think in these examples you cited the channelers lost their ability to channel, because someone else violently broke a weave (especially a shield) by them, while they were channeling. This obviously doesn't seem to be the "officially" precise stilling weave, but rather like a forced explosion of the ability to channel (in this respect rather similar to burning out). However, this form of stilling someone seems quite risky, because it requires that your opponent channels, and it probably might kill him.

I only dimly remember this, but doesn't Siuan even indicate that she was stilled by a circle of AS in a process that took some time. So, apparently the real stilling is a bit more complicated, because it's basically a very delicate "surgically" removal of the ability to channel.

Since Rand & Co. likely don't know how this exactly works (or e.g. Cadsuane doesn't want to give it away), it would explain why they don't do it.


From Nynaeve's PoV in TSR it shows that it is a very sharp shield which permanently destroys your ability to channel. Egwene describes hers as a powerful and sharp shield too when she stills Amico. It doesn't require channeling... it merely requires a powerful channeler who is capable of precision weaving.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2061 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 657 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 340 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 802 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1048 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1161 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 775 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1329 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 781 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 304 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1070 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 648 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 675 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 616 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 680 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 726 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 743 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 639 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 656 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 717 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 658 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 698 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 861 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 744 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 688 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 791 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 766 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 826 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 656 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 875 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 730 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1410 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 743 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 820 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1361 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 654 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 768 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1440 Views

Reply to Message