View original post
I was trying to make the point that it would not have been hard for RJ to have easily made things happen if he had been trying to make the point about sexuality. Clearly Rhavin was not bisexual nor was Balthamel before his body swap. I was trying (unsuccessfully) to make the point that it would not have been out of place if RJ had made them both bisexual or Aginor gay etc
Yeah, that makes sense. I think its yet another example of people wanting to see something in WoT that RJ was not interested in telling, and then reading into its absence, attitudes that don't necessarily apply to Jordan. IDK what his views were on homosexuality, but sex isn't nearly as much of a priority for him as it was for a lot of his readers (it didn't help that he was middle-aged when writing the story, while most readers took it up in their adolescence). He cared more about relationships than about the physical aspects of them. It should suffice that he made his point by having the Maidens matter-of-factly allude to Seonid's sexuality, but people for whom homosexual equality is a pet issue wanted to wallow in it some more. It kind of reminds me how Cracked.com writers keep harping on the Marvel movies failing to address their notion that Thor & Loki should stand the religion discussion on its head, completely overlooking that Avengers dismissed that whole point with a single line, where Captain America simply blows off Loki's assertion of his divinity, saying "You're not my God." It might be important to certain fans, but it's not what the story is about, so shut up.
I was trying to make the point that it would not have been hard for RJ to have easily made things happen if he had been trying to make the point about sexuality. Clearly Rhavin was not bisexual nor was Balthamel before his body swap. I was trying (unsuccessfully) to make the point that it would not have been out of place if RJ had made them both bisexual or Aginor gay etc
Yeah, that makes sense. I think its yet another example of people wanting to see something in WoT that RJ was not interested in telling, and then reading into its absence, attitudes that don't necessarily apply to Jordan. IDK what his views were on homosexuality, but sex isn't nearly as much of a priority for him as it was for a lot of his readers (it didn't help that he was middle-aged when writing the story, while most readers took it up in their adolescence). He cared more about relationships than about the physical aspects of them. It should suffice that he made his point by having the Maidens matter-of-factly allude to Seonid's sexuality, but people for whom homosexual equality is a pet issue wanted to wallow in it some more. It kind of reminds me how Cracked.com writers keep harping on the Marvel movies failing to address their notion that Thor & Loki should stand the religion discussion on its head, completely overlooking that Avengers dismissed that whole point with a single line, where Captain America simply blows off Loki's assertion of his divinity, saying "You're not my God." It might be important to certain fans, but it's not what the story is about, so shut up.
I don't know how RJ felt about homosexuality either, I always assumed it was something he didn't give much thought. Sure he liked to toss in some comments about Pillow Friends and such, but it's not like he ever even came close to depicting it in anything but the most vague terms. I personally don' think he had a very clear idea of what homosexuality really is since his depiction was closer to a few "college girls experimenting".
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Gender in WoT
- 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM
1510 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP)
- 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM
873 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP)
- 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM
976 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP)
- 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM
803 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake
- 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM
1041 Views
It was wrong because sodomy is an abomination against the Light
- 21/10/2016 11:04:08 AM
929 Views
Re: It was wrong because sodomy is an abomination against the Light
- 21/10/2016 11:14:41 AM
868 Views
Re: It was wrong because sodomy is an abomination against the Light
- 21/10/2016 11:31:16 AM
1021 Views
Re: It was wrong because sodomy is an abomination against the Light
- 21/10/2016 12:28:11 PM
836 Views
The difference in the Wheel's "punishment" of of the Forsaken goes back to what was said in TGH.
- 21/10/2016 04:24:12 PM
827 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much
- 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM
908 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much
- 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM
867 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much
- 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM
937 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much
- 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM
825 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is
- 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM
800 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is
- 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM
834 Views
That's an unfair assessment
- 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM
1145 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment
- 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM
1052 Views
Should have been more clear
- 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM
957 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then.
- 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM
833 Views
I agree
- 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM
1029 Views
Makes me wonder how they will handle if the produce a TV show
- 23/10/2016 03:03:18 PM
1061 Views
IMHO dexterity only ever seemed to BE an equalizer power-wise in head to head combat.
- 23/10/2016 04:35:28 PM
953 Views
Re: IMHO dexterity only ever seemed to BE an equalizer power-wise in head to head combat.
- 23/10/2016 05:41:27 PM
777 Views
If ether of their Traveling weaves needed to use less raw Power, it's the male's.
- 23/10/2016 06:17:04 PM
846 Views