Active Users:1200 Time:22/11/2024 04:39:21 PM
Re: I think it's RJ's gender commentary kHz1000 Send a noteboard - 19/10/2016 01:01:14 PM

Thanks for this, was an interesting read!


I don't think the Blues are necessarily politicians, they are idealists and activists, and it is an indicator of the current state of the Tower that idealism and activism translates into political scheming and power games. The political focus is hardly unique to that Ajah, either. How many Yellows do we see running around the world looking to Heal? All of them seem far more oriented toward the Tower than might be expected, and only the Reds have the excuse of being on top of things, what with the world remaining unbroken for three thousand years, and even RJ giving them credit for being so effective at hunting men that they have culled the trait from the population. Every other Ajah's chosen specialization seems to have a negligible effect on the world, except maybe the Whites, who explicitly don't care. What matters in choice of Ajah is how and why you use whatever skills, regardless of with which Ajah they are generally associated.

The Reds find one or two male channelers a year. Effective perhaps but not efficient, what with 200 sisters whose raison d'etre it is to seek them out. And what about the Green? You imply they spend plenty of time in the Borderlands, but what are they doing there? Aisling Noon was the king's advisor in tEotW but there were no Greens at the Gap. Even the White, despite their avowed interest in philosophy, seem to treat it as almost nothing more than some vaguely defined notion of being unemotional (I'm thinking of Alviarin's disdain for the two mathematical logicians).
Reply to message
Noticed something odd - 13/10/2016 09:31:54 PM 1131 Views
Familiarity breeds contempt? - 14/10/2016 12:41:44 AM 995 Views
I can see how this would keep a woman from attaining the Shawl - 14/10/2016 03:00:32 PM 615 Views
Re: Familiarity breeds contempt? - 17/10/2016 06:35:20 PM 767 Views
Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 11:25:44 AM 709 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 03:54:23 PM 644 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 04:02:54 PM 614 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 05:03:58 PM 580 Views
Re: Ironically, that was a rather ill-informed comment - 18/10/2016 07:18:13 PM 708 Views
I think politics keeps women away from the Blue - 18/10/2016 10:20:50 PM 591 Views
I think it's RJ's gender commentary - Blue are ambitious, which is not a stereotypical female trait - 19/10/2016 02:57:51 AM 789 Views
Re: I think it's RJ's gender commentary - 19/10/2016 01:01:14 PM 641 Views
Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 19/10/2016 09:19:01 PM 754 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 19/10/2016 09:48:17 PM 566 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 20/10/2016 06:13:27 PM 671 Views
Re: Sorry, I am gonna ramble a bit - 20/10/2016 07:14:51 PM 529 Views
I guess that's my issue with it - 20/10/2016 09:53:38 PM 683 Views
Grays=political power... How exactly? - 21/10/2016 08:38:07 AM 611 Views
Re: Grays=political power... How exactly? - 21/10/2016 09:21:13 AM 715 Views
Comparative to joining the Red is how I meant that - 21/10/2016 03:22:46 PM 632 Views
Forget the "locals"... IIRC Aes Sedai have kids "rarely" not "never". - 14/10/2016 06:40:56 AM 614 Views
Another good point! - 14/10/2016 03:28:44 PM 594 Views
Re: Noticed something odd - 11/11/2016 12:54:24 AM 738 Views
Possibly, - 11/11/2016 08:45:15 PM 827 Views

Reply to Message