Active Users:1123 Time:22/11/2024 04:17:39 PM
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM

and none of which prove a damn thing about the specifics of the weaves, only that the shields are hard to break and do not seem flexible. I'm attempting a theoretical discussion here. Berowyn proves the point that vastly more effective shields are possible and that Shields can ALSO be flexible. Nothing more and nothing less. Why is this simple concept so difficult for you to grasp?

The second concept is that it's theoretically possible that a stone wall shield is more effective against a man and a more flexible shield is more effective against a woman. I say this solely based on the fact that Berowyn's flexible shield is vastly more effective than the standard shields we see used against a woman than any other shield we see throughout the entire series. I cannot, and have not stated that a flexible shield would be more effective against a man.

I would assert, based on so many other examples outside of shielding, that during the AoL there were likely many variations on shielding that have probably been lost to post-Breaking channeling organizations. This is loosely supported by both Lanfear and Graendal being vastly more effective at Shielding stronger males than anyone else we've seen. I am not, nor have I ever, refuted that they used "stone wall" or firm forms of Shielding, only that they probably didn't use the same technique as modern Aes Sedai, who's Shields would have been instantly destroyed by a Forsaken level male. In fact we know for fact that Verin and Alanna linked are very close to, if not stronger than, Lanfear and their shielding attempts were a total joke, whereas Lanfear nearly succeeds, even before she picked up the angreal.

On a side note, I will state that you are a massive hypocrite for using arguments about "ignoring direct quotes" ... no one on this forum dismisses direct quotes more than you when it suits their purposes. cough Aviendha's quotes about Egwene's strength.

So I'll make this simple so you can follow:

  1. We know a flexible shield enabled Berowyn to hold a woman 38 levels above her with little/no effort

  2. We know that Galina would easily be able to break Mecaras shield with a 13 level difference

  3. Verin and Alanna linked could not shield Rand once he was holding the Power. Likely a maximum of 7 levels weaker than Rand

  4. Graendal was able to cut off and hold a shield on both Aran'gar and Delana despite being 6 levels lower in raw strength

  5. Lanfear was capable of shielding Rand with 5-6 levels lower strength and she clearly used a more effective shield against Asmodean who was 4 levels stronger than her.

  6. Nynaeve was unable to cut off Elayne who was 6-8 levels weaker than Nynaeve

  7. Logain could have broken Nynaeve's shield with a maximum 7 level strength difference

  8. Rand broke through a shield held by 3 women who combined were at least his equal in raw strength given that Sashalle was a level 14, even two very weak Aes Sedai combined with her would have been stronger than Lanfear at the least.

It's not that difficult to realize that there are more effective ways to Shield someone, even someone massively stronger than you are, than used by modern Aes Sedai. It's just as obvious that the standard shields Aes Sedai teach are less effective than the shields used by Berowyn, Lanfear or Graendal. It seems likely that Moghedien's shield on Liandrin was probably a more effective shield as well, admittedly that is an assumption.

Shielding strikes me as something similar to Wards and thus there could be thousands of variations that would have just as many effectiveness levels. It seems, as with so many other things, like the Aes Sedai (likely the Reds) taught their traditional shielding weave and discouraged further study once they decided this was the most effective method.

Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2290 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1078 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1217 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 911 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1161 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1025 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1088 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1149 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1000 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 913 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 968 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1037 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 822 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1050 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 933 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1066 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 873 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1079 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1201 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1150 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1091 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1066 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 883 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1188 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 488 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1125 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1267 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1041 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1316 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1097 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1253 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1034 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1129 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1307 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 868 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 890 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 936 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 879 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1007 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 778 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1000 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 539 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 514 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 897 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 914 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1006 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 991 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 920 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1067 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 798 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 865 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 759 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 674 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 888 Views

Reply to Message