what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
Liandrin doesn't possess anywhere close to the strength to force the shield to bend or break so the knot is the only thing we need to hear about. You assuming that one of the Forsaken would use the exact same weave as a modern Aes Sedai is beyond silly.
I'm not in the mood for insults so I am out of this conversation.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
- 2291 Views
Uhhh...
12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
- 1218 Views
Yet there are problems with either
15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
- 912 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
- 1161 Views
random thought on Shielding
19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
- 1089 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
- 1149 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
- 1002 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
- 914 Views
it's a visualization thing really
20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
- 969 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
- 1037 Views
Not really though
21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
- 823 Views
I always explained it as
21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
- 1050 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
- 934 Views
That's precisely my point
21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
- 1066 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
- 875 Views
There's actual evidence:
22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
- 1079 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
- 1203 Views
Whoa..
22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
- 1150 Views
Not at all
22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
- 1091 Views
Wonderful
22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
- 1066 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
- 884 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
- 1189 Views
Hmmm....
23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
- 1125 Views
Let me clear this up
25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
- 1268 Views
Some more quotes
25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
- 1041 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
- 1316 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
- 1097 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
- 1253 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
- 1034 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
- 944 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
- 869 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
- 890 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
- 937 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
- 879 Views
Simple
19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
- 1008 Views
Not at all
19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
- 780 Views
Huh?
20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
- 1000 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM*
20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
- 539 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
- 514 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
- 898 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
- 914 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
- 1008 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
- 991 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
- 920 Views
Uhhh...
22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
- 1067 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
- 799 Views