I don't think you can say the Aes Sedai shielding is only male optimized. Nynaeve used a typical AS shield against Moghedien, and Moggy's shield was no different. Nynaeve didn't comment on it. Similarly, no one thought Moggy's shield on Liandrin was different. Only the knot, which was made immensely complex.
Moghedien shielded Nyn in TAR, and she tried to break free and it was a solid wall, no flex reported.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
- 2290 Views
Uhhh...
12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
- 1216 Views
Yet there are problems with either
15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
- 910 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
- 1159 Views
random thought on Shielding
19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
- 1087 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
- 1148 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
- 1000 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
- 912 Views
it's a visualization thing really
20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
- 967 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
- 1035 Views
Not really though
21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
- 821 Views
I always explained it as
21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
- 1048 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
- 933 Views
That's precisely my point
21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
- 1065 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
- 873 Views
There's actual evidence:
22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
- 1079 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
- 1201 Views
Whoa..
22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
- 1149 Views
Not at all
22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
- 1091 Views
Wonderful
22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
- 1064 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
- 883 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
- 1188 Views
Hmmm....
23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
- 1125 Views
Let me clear this up
25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
- 1266 Views
Some more quotes
25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
- 1039 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
- 1314 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
- 1095 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
- 1252 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
- 1032 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
- 942 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
- 868 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
- 890 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
- 935 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
- 877 Views
Simple
19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
- 1006 Views
Not at all
19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
- 778 Views
Huh?
20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
- 998 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM*
20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
- 539 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
- 514 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
- 896 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
- 914 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
- 1005 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
- 989 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
- 918 Views
Uhhh...
22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
- 1065 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
- 798 Views