Active Users:1095 Time:20/10/2025 09:57:41 PM
Not the crux of the debate... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM

I don't see any issues with how you think the Power flows into channelers. Only that it would affect shileding. We know for a fact that shielding is a matter of concentration (on both ends). So couldn't just as convincing a case be made, using exactly how you visualize things, that men, who need to focus so much on controlling saidin, are a lot more susceptible to shields?

We've only seen the strongest men have no issues shielding women. In fact, even Rand says shielding Shalon takes a considerable amount of the OP. We've seen no weaker men claim any ease in shielding women, and there have been multiple instances where this could have been stated.

Instead, all we have is RJ saying that shielding someone of the opposite sex is harder. He doesn't say men have it easier than women.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 2942 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1352 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1494 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1207 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1602 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1301 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1345 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1432 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1301 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1217 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1238 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1333 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1088 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1351 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1221 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1303 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1160 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1330 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1501 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1402 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1357 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1339 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1152 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1569 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 711 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1550 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1584 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1346 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1682 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1335 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1643 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1325 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1227 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1537 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1580 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1147 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1205 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1209 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1146 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1266 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1072 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1331 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 697 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 661 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1173 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1224 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1279 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1240 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1217 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1342 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1085 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1116 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1016 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1006 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1165 Views

Reply to Message