Active Users:754 Time:20/12/2025 11:31:02 AM
Not the crux of the debate... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM

I don't see any issues with how you think the Power flows into channelers. Only that it would affect shileding. We know for a fact that shielding is a matter of concentration (on both ends). So couldn't just as convincing a case be made, using exactly how you visualize things, that men, who need to focus so much on controlling saidin, are a lot more susceptible to shields?

We've only seen the strongest men have no issues shielding women. In fact, even Rand says shielding Shalon takes a considerable amount of the OP. We've seen no weaker men claim any ease in shielding women, and there have been multiple instances where this could have been stated.

Instead, all we have is RJ saying that shielding someone of the opposite sex is harder. He doesn't say men have it easier than women.

Reply to message
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66 - 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM 3072 Views
Or we can choose to assume Elayne is incorrect - 11/01/2016 03:50:14 PM 1416 Views
Uhhh... - 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM 1551 Views
Yet there are problems with either - 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM 1272 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either - 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM 1655 Views
Would you consider... - 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM 1336 Views
random thought on Shielding - 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM 1411 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though. - 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM 1503 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this - 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM 1344 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness - 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM 1266 Views
it's a visualization thing really - 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM 1302 Views
Not the crux of the debate... - 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM 1382 Views
Not really though - 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM 1138 Views
I always explained it as - 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM 1406 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same - 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM 1264 Views
That's precisely my point - 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM 1369 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence - 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM 1215 Views
There's actual evidence: - 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM 1379 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position - 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM 1566 Views
Whoa.. - 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM 1443 Views
Not at all - 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM 1386 Views
Wonderful - 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM 1377 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM 1207 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this - 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM 1618 Views
Petty much *NM* - 24/01/2016 02:50:32 PM 734 Views
Hmmm.... - 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM 1613 Views
Let me clear this up - 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM 1646 Views
Some more quotes - 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM 1402 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM 1745 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM 1383 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM 1691 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise - 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM 1369 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing - 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM 1278 Views
Oh well then I agree with you - 26/01/2016 08:50:55 AM 1611 Views
thanks - 26/01/2016 04:26:46 PM 1631 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM 1212 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw - 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM 1265 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other? - 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM 1265 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me - 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM 1206 Views
Simple - 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM 1323 Views
Not at all - 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM 1121 Views
Huh? - 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM 1385 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way *NM* - 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM 735 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM* - 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM 696 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM 1226 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. - 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM 1271 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true - 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM 1335 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM 1311 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this - 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM 1270 Views
Uhhh... - 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM 1393 Views
Funny, I just saw this post - 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM 1127 Views
The very first chapter (the Prologue) disproves this - 03/10/2016 06:56:28 AM 1168 Views
No it doesn't - 05/10/2016 12:47:03 AM 1058 Views
Re: Don't those two facts explain each other? - 08/10/2016 05:06:53 AM 1057 Views
Re: Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing... - 08/10/2016 04:52:06 AM 1206 Views

Reply to Message