View original post
How can a fixed amount of Power be overdrawn upon?
How can a fixed amount of Power be overdrawn upon?
If an angreal offers 100 units of additive saidar how can someone draw 150 units through it?
The fixed amount is what the angreal adds. The overdrawing is all you. After all, you have no objection to that other fixed amount- a channeler's potential, being overdrawn upon, right?
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
- 2446 Views
Uhhh...
12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
- 1291 Views
Yet there are problems with either
15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
- 986 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
- 1244 Views
random thought on Shielding
19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
- 1129 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
- 1227 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
- 1072 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
- 989 Views
it's a visualization thing really
20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
- 1037 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
- 1084 Views
Not really though
21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
- 897 Views
I always explained it as
21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
- 1119 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
- 1011 Views
That's precisely my point
21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
- 1105 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
- 941 Views
There's actual evidence:
22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
- 1115 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
- 1273 Views
Whoa..
22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
- 1184 Views
Not at all
22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
- 1159 Views
Wonderful
22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
- 1139 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
- 957 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
- 1237 Views
Hmmm....
23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
- 1202 Views
Let me clear this up
25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
- 1338 Views
Some more quotes
25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
- 1117 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
- 1388 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
- 1137 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
- 1313 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
- 1102 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
- 1015 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
- 942 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
- 963 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
- 1003 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
- 965 Views
Simple
19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
- 1086 Views
Not at all
19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
- 847 Views
Huh?
20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
- 1074 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way
*NM*
20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
- 569 Views

I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
- 534 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
- 969 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
- 980 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
- 1080 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
- 1033 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
- 985 Views
Uhhh...
22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
- 1133 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
- 871 Views