That it's additive and multiplied?
i.e.
Angreal might give multiplier X2 on base plus some fixed amount? This would explain how stronger channelers get more, but also explain how someone weak would get a large benefit.
Angreal, Sa'angreal and Moiraine at 66
- 11/01/2016 08:53:23 AM
2290 Views
Uhhh...
- 12/01/2016 12:07:42 AM
1217 Views
Yet there are problems with either
- 15/01/2016 08:52:04 PM
911 Views
Re: Yet there are problems with either
- 16/01/2016 05:29:11 AM
1161 Views
Would you consider...
- 17/01/2016 09:06:59 AM
1026 Views
random thought on Shielding
- 19/01/2016 07:34:20 PM
1088 Views
You're forgetting the other side, though.
- 19/01/2016 08:19:59 PM
1149 Views
yes but it doesn't proactively do this
- 19/01/2016 10:06:25 PM
1000 Views
Responding to a shield doesn't require proactiveness
- 20/01/2016 05:53:24 AM
913 Views
it's a visualization thing really
- 20/01/2016 04:39:08 PM
968 Views
Not the crux of the debate...
- 21/01/2016 03:37:40 AM
1037 Views
Not really though
- 21/01/2016 05:00:34 PM
822 Views
I always explained it as
- 21/01/2016 09:26:35 PM
1050 Views
There's not much to go on since all the shields except Berowyn's are the same
- 21/01/2016 09:55:14 PM
934 Views
That's precisely my point
- 21/01/2016 10:09:02 PM
1066 Views
now you are speculating based on a lack of evidence
- 21/01/2016 10:39:13 PM
873 Views
There's actual evidence:
- 22/01/2016 06:25:25 AM
1079 Views
what's dense here is that you keep putting in quotes that don't support your position
- 22/01/2016 03:28:16 PM
1201 Views
Whoa..
- 22/01/2016 04:24:19 PM
1150 Views
Not at all
- 22/01/2016 05:03:50 PM
1091 Views
Wonderful
- 22/01/2016 06:30:35 PM
1066 Views
yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 22/01/2016 06:46:23 PM
884 Views
Re: yup that's my argument. that and you're a dick so I'm done with this
- 23/01/2016 02:35:33 PM
1188 Views
Hmmm....
- 23/01/2016 03:06:15 PM
1125 Views
Let me clear this up
- 25/01/2016 04:19:51 PM
1267 Views
Some more quotes
- 25/01/2016 05:10:51 PM
1041 Views
none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 25/01/2016 07:19:48 PM
1316 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 03:45:52 AM
1097 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 09:00:55 AM
1253 Views
Re: none of which I've denied or tried to prove otherwise
- 26/01/2016 10:39:49 AM
1034 Views
from the very beginning of this conversation I've been saying I'm theorizing
- 26/01/2016 04:09:19 PM
942 Views
Yes, but that's not what I'm arguing...
- 16/01/2016 08:56:15 AM
868 Views
But additive doesn't explain buffers and being able to overdraw
- 16/01/2016 03:02:33 PM
890 Views
Don't those two facts explain each other?
- 16/01/2016 03:24:44 PM
937 Views
It actually seems counterintuitive to me
- 19/01/2016 07:15:37 PM
879 Views
Simple
- 19/01/2016 08:21:11 PM
1007 Views
Not at all
- 19/01/2016 10:17:39 PM
778 Views
Huh?
- 20/01/2016 06:01:04 AM
1000 Views
agree to disagree I suppose ... I don't see it this way 
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
539 Views
*NM*
- 20/01/2016 04:41:16 PM
539 Views
I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position. *NM*
- 21/01/2016 12:01:16 AM
514 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 02:07:21 AM
897 Views
Re: I didn't sense disagreement so much as confusion over my position.
- 21/01/2016 03:32:59 AM
914 Views
I don't necessarily think that's true
- 21/01/2016 05:07:40 PM
1007 Views
I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:01:17 PM
991 Views
Re: I don't see how magnifiers solve this
- 21/01/2016 10:16:16 PM
920 Views
Uhhh...
- 22/01/2016 06:51:11 AM
1067 Views
Funny, I just saw this post
- 17/09/2016 11:13:09 PM
798 Views