Seriously? I ended up skimming past the personal WoT history part (I have a feeling that will be in most reviews), and found myself at the end.
Too vague for my blood.
Too vague for my blood.
Still at least we've got a 'review' not tainted by dodgy past reviews. Though at the point of having the prologue and the first 2 chapters it'd have to go markedly downhill from there to be COT like.
another review of TGS (from Tar Valon.net)
- 02/10/2009 08:20:09 PM
2126 Views
Great review.
- 02/10/2009 10:03:59 PM
657 Views
Re: Great review.
- 02/10/2009 11:14:45 PM
642 Views
How do you know? What if she's wrong? *NM*
- 03/10/2009 11:23:20 AM
250 Views
These things are subjective, surely. I'm not sure one could be wrong. *NM*
- 03/10/2009 12:24:59 PM
258 Views
That's a review?
- 03/10/2009 01:51:59 AM
690 Views
True, more 'I liked it'
- 03/10/2009 08:52:44 AM
568 Views
True, I could have written that review and haven't read the book. *NM*
- 04/10/2009 03:29:34 PM
254 Views
Sounds optimistic...
- 03/10/2009 12:21:49 PM
871 Views
I found the optimism striking, actually.
- 03/10/2009 01:19:54 PM
602 Views
Indeed.
- 03/10/2009 01:23:48 PM
627 Views