Active Users:348 Time:03/04/2025 11:25:58 PM
Why does anybody care? Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM

I ignore things I don't like from canon all the time. It'd only be relevant if we were expecting some kind of sequel and wanted to make sure that material wasn't included, but given that this is a completed work, it doesn't change anything to anything.

The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 1680 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1058 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 458 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 484 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 459 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 460 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1213 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1118 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 590 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 869 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 1003 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 996 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 851 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 923 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1053 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 465 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 483 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 525 Views

Reply to Message