Active Users:1141 Time:22/11/2024 07:50:32 PM
My replies to numbers 4 and 6 RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 07/06/2013 04:49:13 PM

4. Why didn't Lanfear just use 2 different weaves to kill at the end instead of using compulsion on Perrin?

Plot Induced Stupidity. I really don't hold anything against B. Sanderson but it's obvious to me that there were many scenes that I felt R. Jordan would have written very differently. It is fairly easy to tell if something was in the general plot outline but not detailed and this is one of those minor elements that R. Jordan would have used to tie up a dangling loose end.


6. Does it seem to anyone else like Demandred was actually not that great of a general? With his advantages it seems that he easily should have won this battle. I never felt that impressed by him tactically, and can think of a dozen sneaky tactics he could have used to win handily.

No, he wasn't. But I have been telling people for quite a few books to prepare for disappointment. It can be attributed to many things: his exhaustion at having accomplished his mission of bringing the Sharans under him, his exhaustion channeling so much of the Power, his arrogance undermining his strategic ability, etc. Maybe R. Jordan would have had him behave differently because he had a different understanding of combat than B. Sanderson?

"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Lingering questions about AMOL-- stuff not resolved - 27/05/2013 09:08:36 AM 1306 Views
Re: Lingering questions about AMOL-- stuff not resolved - 04/06/2013 11:13:51 PM 740 Views
Re: Lingering questions about AMOL-- stuff not resolved - 05/06/2013 05:53:46 PM 1099 Views
Re: Lingering questions about AMOL-- stuff not resolved - 05/06/2013 09:23:52 PM 898 Views
My replies to numbers 4 and 6 - 07/06/2013 04:49:13 PM 714 Views

Reply to Message