Thanks for the well done and detailed reply.....but I must admit.....
Anonymous2000 Send a noteboard - 26/03/2013 02:53:02 AM
.....most of it flew over my head! I was more of a detailed WOT reader during books 1-6, but the other books made me more apathetic. By Sanderson's books, I was more of a story focused reader and just cared about the broad strokes.
Honestly, if it wasn't for Sanderson, I likely would have abandoned the series and never finished it. RJ completely lost me after COT.
His ability to write RJ's characters "correctly".....
23/03/2013 03:10:46 AM
- 1930 Views
I'm not the most attentive or critical of readers...
23/03/2013 04:50:53 AM
- 1173 Views
Re: I'm not the most attentive or critical of readers...
23/03/2013 05:10:41 AM
- 991 Views
Mat IS a D&D character who broke through the 4th wall and kept hearing his player roll dice. *NM*
24/03/2013 07:09:22 AM
- 452 Views
Can you mention some specific examples of problems with Mat?
23/03/2013 04:56:36 PM
- 934 Views
Some of it was before AMOL
23/03/2013 11:33:22 PM
- 969 Views
Not perfect, but I did expect them to be good. And they weren't good. They were very bad. Awful. *NM*
23/03/2013 08:30:23 PM
- 428 Views
Please give a few examples..... *NM*
24/03/2013 04:09:28 PM
- 397 Views
Re: Please give a few examples.....
25/03/2013 07:23:01 PM
- 1145 Views
Re: Please give a few examples.....
25/03/2013 07:45:26 PM
- 942 Views
Thanks for the well done and detailed reply.....but I must admit.....
26/03/2013 02:53:02 AM
- 1002 Views
I still say Harriet and Co. erred in getting a fantasy novelist
23/03/2013 09:35:01 PM
- 950 Views
Maybe, but if thay had we'd still be waiting for ToM... *NM*
25/03/2013 12:02:39 PM
- 391 Views
Or would not have needed a ToM. Maybe a pro could have follow RJs plan & kept it to one book. *NM*
26/03/2013 11:56:03 PM
- 433 Views
Re: Or would not have needed a ToM. Maybe a pro could have follow RJs plan & kept it to one book.
29/04/2013 08:16:49 PM
- 790 Views