Active Users:1051 Time:23/11/2024 11:59:48 AM
I understand what you're saying ... Shishka Send a noteboard - 30/09/2009 04:04:17 PM
... and I agree that the greatest benefit in a mixed circle occurs when the two halves of the OP are woven together. But I still have the impression (despite your arguments) that there is some benefit even when the two halves aren't woven together.

I'm still not sure about what the leader can do with the OP she's accessing through the other members. I agree that it's not passing through her, as you said. But I still think she doesn't have to utilize/weave any of the power she's drawing through other members, if she doesn't want to. I think she can just let it dissipate back into the OP pool, essentially.

Consider when Elza obliterated Osan'gar at the Cleansing. From the wording of that scene, it seems she only used the saidin she drew through Narishma and Callandor, even though she was accessing saidar through Merise at the time.

Also, consider Rand at the Cleansing. He used saidar and saidin completely differently - he never combined them into a single weave. And if he could do that, it would seem he could have chosen not to do ANYTHING with the saidar he was drawing from Nynaeve, also.

But your argument - that the leader can't help but use at least a very small portion of the OP she has access to through each member, when weaving - actually explains the general impression I get, that there is ALWAYS some advantage to being the leader of a mixed circle, in terms of the potency of the weaves generated. That is, because the leader has to draw & utilize at least a small portion of the OP from each member, the resulting weave will always have at least a small mixture of both halves of the OP, and therefore will always result in a more potent result compared to if only the same amount of one half of the OP was used.

Whereas, I was trying to explain that general impression by suggesting that the leader gets some Precision advantage from the mixed link regardless which power(s) he/she uses, and from which members, in any particular weave. Despite your arguments, I'm still not convinced I'm wrong about that. But, I could be.

Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.

-BHT&tM
Reply to message
Male/Female circles - 25/09/2009 09:33:38 PM 847 Views
Yes; somewhat. - 25/09/2009 10:57:35 PM 528 Views
Re: Yes; somewhat. - 26/09/2009 06:19:45 AM 464 Views
Why would saidar surprise him? - 26/09/2009 03:40:23 PM 505 Views
Re: Why would saidar surprise him? - 26/09/2009 06:34:04 PM 476 Views
He thought they were Aes Sedai who could not channel? - 26/09/2009 07:02:42 PM 419 Views
He did not know they were Aes Sedai until after the mixed weave struck his warding. - 26/09/2009 10:13:10 PM 419 Views
You're right. I misremembered. *NM* - 26/09/2009 10:17:22 PM 196 Views
right... - 26/09/2009 02:56:26 PM 476 Views
Re: right... - 26/09/2009 07:49:21 PM 458 Views
I think Lanfear clears this up... - 27/09/2009 05:19:37 AM 481 Views
But he did see the weaves - 29/09/2009 03:38:10 PM 428 Views
Agreed, plus some numbers ... - 28/09/2009 07:50:54 PM 438 Views
I don't agree with some of this - 28/09/2009 09:37:13 PM 429 Views
Re: I don't agree with some of this - 29/09/2009 02:39:46 PM 468 Views
Re: I don't agree with some of this - 29/09/2009 06:07:56 PM 398 Views
Re: I don't agree with some of this - 29/09/2009 07:00:28 PM 432 Views
Re: I don't agree with some of this - 29/09/2009 08:25:19 PM 506 Views
I understand what you're saying ... - 30/09/2009 04:04:17 PM 428 Views
Indeed - 30/09/2009 04:32:37 PM 381 Views
Re: Indeed - 30/09/2009 07:05:13 PM 462 Views
Some proof against your idea... - 01/10/2009 03:37:48 AM 432 Views
Nice, thanks ... - 01/10/2009 02:00:24 PM 399 Views
Re: Nice, thanks ... - 01/10/2009 04:58:02 PM 445 Views
That makes more sense, to me ... - 01/10/2009 06:44:44 PM 489 Views
Re: That makes more sense, to me ... - 03/10/2009 06:53:45 AM 499 Views
Re: Male/Female circles - 27/09/2009 02:19:31 PM 439 Views
Re: Male/Female circles - 28/09/2009 03:58:15 PM 431 Views

Reply to Message