Active Users:343 Time:05/04/2025 03:33:05 AM
Re: I think its a warding Tor Send a noteboard - 11/02/2013 01:35:04 PM
The warding is probably inverted, considering Taim can't see it. It's attuned to Demandred and if the flows are directed at him, the ward activates and kills the user. It could be similar to the ward Rand wove around Callandor, promising a nasty surprise to someone who tried to take it.


But then the question is, what does it mean that "the flows are directed at him"? Channeling in his general direction? That would be inconvenient if Taim was directing his flows towards somebody standing between him and Demandred. And how is the direction of channeling even determined? Many complex weaves consists of load of threads twisting around each other, pointing all over the place.
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
Binding an angreal - 09/02/2013 05:35:19 PM 1973 Views
I thought Demandred was bluffing Taim - 09/02/2013 06:40:46 PM 1331 Views
I got the impression that "binding" allowed Demandred to take control of the Power being Channeled - 10/02/2013 12:40:09 AM 1447 Views
Re: I got the impression that "binding" allowed Demandred to take control of the Power being Chan... - 10/02/2013 07:52:59 PM 1149 Views
Perhaps a booby trap type thing ... Or just a wording issue - 10/02/2013 10:58:53 PM 1180 Views
I think its a warding - 11/02/2013 05:34:09 AM 1257 Views
Re: I think its a warding - 11/02/2013 01:35:04 PM 1585 Views
I didn't find it that odd - 10/02/2013 01:33:44 AM 1298 Views
You stole my examples. Good job *NM* - 10/02/2013 04:54:32 AM 740 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 10/02/2013 07:49:57 PM 1407 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 05:55:22 AM 1385 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 06:40:28 AM 1108 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 01:30:30 PM 1152 Views
Re: I didn't find it that odd - 11/02/2013 01:32:00 PM 1132 Views
Taim should have immediatly destroyed sakarnen. - 12/02/2013 03:19:38 PM 1189 Views
Re: Taim should have immediatly destroyed sakarnen. - 13/02/2013 05:01:12 AM 1238 Views

Reply to Message