Re: A "choice" to use anachronistic vocabulary betrays a lack of ability to think
muppet Send a noteboard - 31/01/2013 09:23:14 PM
I don't see what you mean by that. I think Brandon might have made a conscious decision not to ape RJ's style, and for all we know Harriet supported him in that. She was the editor, after all, and she let it all go through.
It's not really THAT difficult to stilt your dialog and prose in the way that RJ did. I think it's overblowing things to say that it's some sort of grand skill. RJ's skill is in his world building and intuition about politics and warfare, in his ability to keep so many plates spinning and still remain almost perfectly consistent, not in his ability to write old-timey dialog and description. That's something any initiate writer ought to be able to do.
Claiming that Brandon, an established author with multiple best sellers under his belt, is less skilled than an initiate writer is just plain bias against the guy that you're most likely harboring because he ruined your favorite series.
Which is a fair cop, I'm not totally happy with the job he did either, but to call him a bad writer based on his use of contemporary dialog is kind of weak. It was just a bad choice, not poor skill.
I don't really feel that "selling lots of books" is an acceptable metric for being a "good writer"
I am quite happy to say that Brandon Sanderson is a bad writer, in the knowledge that he has sold a pile of books.
By way of an anology; ikea sell more furniture than, I imagine, most of the worlds master craftsmen combined.
Nobody will claim they make "the best" furniture.
I will admit that the only writing of sandersons I've read is his interpretations of RJs notes, but I find it poorly crafted, and simplistic.
While I understand your argument and examples, you could apply this same argument to about any metric. Good reviews, critical acclaim (all of which Brandon has). What you're essentially saying is that good writing is subjective and that there's no way to measure it. If we're going to agree on that, then large portions of this entire board are moot and pointless.
All you need is love
31/01/2013 02:12:39 PM
- 1371 Views
Re: All you need is love
31/01/2013 02:15:47 PM
- 836 Views
Mate you're not alone in thinking the androl arc was insanely stupid.
31/01/2013 04:27:59 PM
- 756 Views
Re: Mate you're not alone in thinking the androl arc was insanely stupid.
31/01/2013 04:47:09 PM
- 784 Views
Meh, not really
31/01/2013 05:40:12 PM
- 793 Views
Completely agree
31/01/2013 06:20:35 PM
- 819 Views
Re: Completely agree
31/01/2013 06:25:11 PM
- 1043 Views
A "choice" to use anachronistic vocabulary betrays a lack of ability to think *NM*
31/01/2013 06:38:09 PM
- 456 Views
Re: A "choice" to use anachronistic vocabulary betrays a lack of ability to think
31/01/2013 06:42:42 PM
- 704 Views
Re: A "choice" to use anachronistic vocabulary betrays a lack of ability to think
31/01/2013 07:41:23 PM
- 758 Views
Re: A "choice" to use anachronistic vocabulary betrays a lack of ability to think
31/01/2013 09:23:14 PM
- 695 Views
What's this about one of Nynaeve/Lan dying but being recovered by Rand? Memory is coming up short. *NM*
31/01/2013 05:20:40 PM
- 502 Views
Re: What's this about one of Nynaeve/Lan dying but being recovered by Rand?
31/01/2013 05:35:54 PM
- 887 Views
Re: What's this about one of Nynaeve/Lan dying but being recovered by Rand?
31/01/2013 05:59:46 PM
- 845 Views
Re: What's this about one of Nynaeve/Lan dying but being recovered by Rand?
31/01/2013 06:56:59 PM
- 824 Views
Re: What's this about one of Nynaeve/Lan dying but being recovered by Rand?
31/01/2013 06:59:45 PM
- 866 Views