Active Users:1145 Time:01/11/2024 02:03:34 AM
Absolutely not. Most of them are complaining about structural flaws. Tom Send a noteboard - 23/01/2013 03:50:57 AM
Look at the post above yours for some good examples. Prophecies left hanging, misuse and underuse of characters, bad pacing, bad writing, wooden dialogue - and even if your point had some merit, if a book is judged solely by its plot, it's a pretty piss-poor book to begin with.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
75+% of the negative response to AMOL that I've seen: - 22/01/2013 07:54:41 PM 1301 Views
Absolutely not. Most of them are complaining about structural flaws. - 23/01/2013 03:50:57 AM 1024 Views
Relax, I wasn't talking about your review *NM* - 24/01/2013 05:34:23 PM 263 Views
Neither was I. Look at DomA's comments, for example. *NM* - 24/01/2013 09:27:30 PM 292 Views
Tom and Doma... - 27/01/2013 04:16:09 AM 612 Views
SO TRUE! *NM* - 27/01/2013 09:59:59 AM 203 Views

Reply to Message