Absolutely not. Most of them are complaining about structural flaws.
Tom Send a noteboard - 23/01/2013 03:50:57 AM
Look at the post above yours for some good examples. Prophecies left hanging, misuse and underuse of characters, bad pacing, bad writing, wooden dialogue - and even if your point had some merit, if a book is judged solely by its plot, it's a pretty piss-poor book to begin with.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
75+% of the negative response to AMOL that I've seen:
- 22/01/2013 07:54:41 PM
1310 Views
Pretty much. WoT fans have dissected the series to such a great extent that...
- 23/01/2013 01:19:09 AM
834 Views
Absolutely not. Most of them are complaining about structural flaws.
- 23/01/2013 03:50:57 AM
1033 Views
Relax, I wasn't talking about your review *NM*
- 24/01/2013 05:34:23 PM
265 Views