"chock-full", not "chalk-full". To "chock" is to stuff. Why would anyone think it is "chalk"?
Tom Send a noteboard - 08/01/2013 02:06:31 PM
But for all intensive purposes, I won't make you tow the line or try to seize the reigns of power here, if it's parting parcel of your review. I could care less.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
Review of A Memory of Light: the unabridged audiobook (MINOR SPOILERS)
08/01/2013 01:16:32 AM
- 1615 Views
"chock-full", not "chalk-full". To "chock" is to stuff. Why would anyone think it is "chalk"?
08/01/2013 02:06:31 PM
- 649 Views
Thanks, noted and edited. Word's auto-correct feature is apparently over-eager. *NM*
08/01/2013 02:10:43 PM
- 255 Views