BEcause Cadsuane is close on the heels of Egwene?
fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/11/2012 05:10:50 PM
The issue at hand boils down to how much weaker Cadsuane is compared to Egwene. If you agree that Cadsuane and Bode are equal, then you're left with Egwene's quote:
Which means Cadsuane is immediately one level below Egwene. However, Melaine is at least two levels above Elza. I'd show you the chain of evidence, but Linda has done a pretty bang up job placing these Aes Sedai in their relative hierarchy, so I'll point to that as the evidence.
Its pretty clear that if Elza and Merise can at best match Cadsuane (itself a laughable idea, IMO), there's no way Egwene is also one level above Cadsuane and equal to Amys+Melaine.
Bode's future would be brilliant. Her potential almost equaled Egwene's.
Which means Cadsuane is immediately one level below Egwene. However, Melaine is at least two levels above Elza. I'd show you the chain of evidence, but Linda has done a pretty bang up job placing these Aes Sedai in their relative hierarchy, so I'll point to that as the evidence.
Its pretty clear that if Elza and Merise can at best match Cadsuane (itself a laughable idea, IMO), there's no way Egwene is also one level above Cadsuane and equal to Amys+Melaine.
How many standard deviations is Lanfear
15/11/2012 06:04:39 PM
- 2077 Views
Hmm...
15/11/2012 07:25:34 PM
- 1215 Views
see we CAN agree on stuff
15/11/2012 07:56:12 PM
- 1067 Views
18/11/2012 08:37:22 PM
- 959 Views
Re:
18/11/2012 11:07:17 PM
- 1165 Views
Re:
19/11/2012 05:16:00 AM
- 994 Views
Re:
19/11/2012 03:13:01 PM
- 998 Views
They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 03:19:19 PM
- 1003 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 04:01:43 PM
- 1208 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 09:04:04 PM
- 953 Views
Hmmm...
20/11/2012 02:08:40 AM
- 1021 Views
Perhaps, but Egwene is also being a bit dramatic in the scene as she managed
20/11/2012 04:28:57 AM
- 978 Views
Nope...
20/11/2012 03:13:13 PM
- 1028 Views
I believe she is being over dramatic
20/11/2012 03:26:24 PM
- 928 Views
Keep believing that...
20/11/2012 03:30:14 PM
- 1057 Views
*shrugs*
20/11/2012 03:49:10 PM
- 1006 Views
Tired and forkroot are the same now?
20/11/2012 03:55:22 PM
- 913 Views
No it's the literary device
20/11/2012 04:04:28 PM
- 1034 Views
Impossible. Daigian is exactly 0.32SD below the mean
19/11/2012 11:06:04 AM
- 977 Views
You keep saying that, but it is either a linear or a non-linear distribution
19/11/2012 09:09:32 PM
- 1033 Views
That's the whole point. Thanks for finally seeing it.
19/11/2012 09:43:27 PM
- 996 Views
keep believing that ... but you making up numbers isn't really relevant *NM*
20/11/2012 04:29:44 AM
- 655 Views
Please show me a number that is made up. The 0.32SD for Daigian is a rule of statistics.
20/11/2012 07:15:48 AM
- 958 Views
Ugh. I hate power level discussions. For real world applications, it should be kind of meaningless
16/11/2012 10:28:49 PM
- 949 Views
I don't really agree
18/11/2012 08:40:53 PM
- 891 Views
Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
19/11/2012 09:13:48 PM
- 964 Views
Re: Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
20/11/2012 08:10:01 AM
- 934 Views
Since I've proven that it's not a normal distribution in units of absolute strength, SDs don't apply
17/11/2012 07:48:21 PM
- 992 Views
You have proven nothing, except that you have an opinion *NM*
18/11/2012 02:21:35 AM
- 638 Views
You simply don't get it. It is mathematically a fact. There is no opinion involved.
18/11/2012 02:19:40 PM
- 837 Views
Only because you've assigned numeric values. That you created.
18/11/2012 02:40:51 PM
- 961 Views
It doesn't matter what figure you use...
18/11/2012 03:01:56 PM
- 840 Views
What if Daigian is one third Lanfear's strength?
18/11/2012 04:37:58 PM
- 984 Views
Sure you can
18/11/2012 10:09:31 PM
- 994 Views
Re: Sure you can
18/11/2012 10:54:50 PM
- 944 Views
You're right, though its 37.5%
19/11/2012 12:21:29 AM
- 909 Views
Oops, typo!
19/11/2012 02:54:25 AM
- 980 Views
Again, not possible, due to Daigian being just 0.3SD below the Mean
19/11/2012 08:37:01 AM
- 929 Views
Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
19/11/2012 04:05:12 PM
- 874 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
19/11/2012 05:55:02 PM
- 801 Views
Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
19/11/2012 09:19:50 PM
- 919 Views
Re: Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
20/11/2012 02:11:26 AM
- 947 Views
Forkroot in every case
20/11/2012 04:32:26 AM
- 928 Views
No!
20/11/2012 03:15:16 PM
- 908 Views
I'm not going to go re-read the books to you on this
20/11/2012 03:39:46 PM
- 928 Views
You need to read it for yourself, since you're completely confused.
20/11/2012 03:54:26 PM
- 891 Views
Not going to argue this with you.
20/11/2012 04:09:44 PM
- 864 Views
Your own example disproved your point...
20/11/2012 04:39:25 PM
- 961 Views
let's see, she's both asleep and would need hours to regain her strength
20/11/2012 04:43:17 PM
- 852 Views
Enough!
20/11/2012 05:04:06 PM
- 940 Views
LOL ... whatever. You go on believing that ... no one else sees it this way. *NM*
20/11/2012 05:20:52 PM
- 626 Views
Re: Your own example disproved your point...
20/11/2012 05:10:15 PM
- 982 Views
Barasine + Katerine isn't that much less than
20/11/2012 05:26:31 PM
- 986 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 02:26:47 AM
- 861 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 09:03:40 AM
- 909 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 02:59:08 PM
- 944 Views
None of this is backed by any evidence...
20/11/2012 03:24:12 PM
- 860 Views
who said Cadsuane was 1.5x Moiraine or more?
20/11/2012 04:03:13 PM
- 864 Views
Nope...
20/11/2012 04:41:35 PM
- 906 Views
wrong
20/11/2012 04:48:50 PM
- 839 Views
Better evidence? LOL!
20/11/2012 03:18:55 PM
- 911 Views
Huh? How did you come to that conclusion?
20/11/2012 04:40:56 PM
- 902 Views
BEcause Cadsuane is close on the heels of Egwene?
20/11/2012 05:10:50 PM
- 820 Views
I'm not arguing that. I agree that Cadsuane is pretty close to Egwene
20/11/2012 05:50:34 PM
- 927 Views
Interesting, but let's go with your figures...
19/11/2012 06:54:54 AM
- 973 Views
Indeed
19/11/2012 08:16:44 AM
- 1015 Views
Rand is sort of a special case
20/11/2012 04:25:02 AM
- 841 Views
Regarding Mesaana...
20/11/2012 08:42:56 AM
- 912 Views
You continue to mix two things
20/11/2012 03:24:44 PM
- 840 Views
No
20/11/2012 04:54:19 PM
- 1062 Views
You are mistaken
20/11/2012 05:04:40 PM
- 921 Views
Probably, but the AS have no idea what 37.5% means
19/11/2012 02:59:26 AM
- 865 Views
It's irrelevant
19/11/2012 03:46:42 AM
- 936 Views
Agreed. Daigian is the marker of the absolute bottom of Aes Sedai strength.
19/11/2012 06:55:41 AM
- 900 Views
Daigian
19/11/2012 08:12:19 AM
- 922 Views
It is a direct marker due to RJ's quote
19/11/2012 08:50:26 AM
- 947 Views
You missed my point
19/11/2012 09:08:42 AM
- 879 Views
Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
20/11/2012 04:41:11 AM
- 890 Views
Re: Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
20/11/2012 09:07:49 AM
- 866 Views
Re: Sure you can
19/11/2012 09:22:09 AM
- 1010 Views
Care to explain this...
19/11/2012 05:06:28 PM
- 851 Views
Indeed
20/11/2012 07:16:37 AM
- 1073 Views
Explained far better than I ever could. Bravo.
20/11/2012 07:30:29 AM
- 889 Views
Well duh.
20/11/2012 02:57:24 PM
- 996 Views
Incorrect.
20/11/2012 04:28:07 PM
- 981 Views
No
20/11/2012 04:44:16 PM
- 955 Views
You're integrating without lower limits...
20/11/2012 02:55:06 PM
- 931 Views
We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
20/11/2012 04:44:24 AM
- 775 Views
Re: We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
20/11/2012 07:02:47 AM
- 966 Views
You must tell me of this special math...
20/11/2012 03:10:09 PM
- 862 Views
Re: You must tell me of this special math...
20/11/2012 04:29:40 PM
- 898 Views
Morghase is a placeholder...
20/11/2012 04:45:42 PM
- 965 Views
Well...
18/11/2012 08:43:59 PM
- 998 Views
Re: Well...
19/11/2012 03:40:44 PM
- 978 Views
Wow.
19/11/2012 03:53:47 PM
- 1024 Views
Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
19/11/2012 06:09:36 PM
- 874 Views
Re: Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
19/11/2012 07:42:58 PM
- 776 Views
this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
20/11/2012 04:51:20 AM
- 969 Views
Re: this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
20/11/2012 02:45:18 PM
- 911 Views
I think RJ went out of his way to keep strength a bit of a mystery
20/11/2012 08:42:44 PM
- 916 Views
Math gurus...Is it possible to find the missing variable...
21/11/2012 05:12:24 PM
- 921 Views
the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
22/11/2012 02:55:03 AM
- 982 Views
Re: the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
22/11/2012 03:15:33 AM
- 1275 Views
I do not think you can calculate the Mean without knowing the Units of Power
22/11/2012 03:53:59 AM
- 1074 Views