Daigian could well be lower than the 62.5% number RJ stated as we know the Tower has been weakening for centuries.
Daigian meets the current standards, if barely (if she didn't she would not have be allowed to pass the test for the shawl, she'd had remained an Accepted, constrained to remain in TV). RJ said only 32.5% of women are strong enough to meet them. It's possible the standards have been lowered at some point, though the AS seem to imply they did not (one of them mentioned at some point that despite the decreasing strength and the fact less and less candidates could meet the standards, they were not to lower them...) but 32,5% of women was the current state of things anyway (or RJ would have specified the number applied to a past state of things, not the current one...), and that forcibly includes Daigian at the minimal required level to be allowed to past the test.
My point being a combination of declining numbers and declining strength could easily lead to declining standards. Daigian was clearly dedicated to earning the Shawl, the AS may well have decided to lower the standard to keep numbers up. Obviously I'm in pure speculation territory, but Daigian could just as easily be an example of the decline of the WT as anything else. Ultimately it has little bearing on Bell Curves etc...
The context of the Q&A makes it very clear RJ was referring to the story's contemporary WT standards.
She lies exactly on that boundary that RJ was referring to.
I actually think she lies below this boundary. She seems to be too weak to become an AS but got through using perseverance. The fact that most AS treat her as little better than a wilder demonstrates this. I think she is significantly below the next strongest AS, whomever that is. It makes no difference though, Daigian's strength has never been a direct marker of OP strength like Lanfear or Egwene's has. She's merely a name for the weakest AS level, and whether its Daigain or Vandene or Adeleas makes no difference.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
How many standard deviations is Lanfear
15/11/2012 06:04:39 PM
- 2071 Views
Hmm...
15/11/2012 07:25:34 PM
- 1206 Views
see we CAN agree on stuff
15/11/2012 07:56:12 PM
- 1063 Views
18/11/2012 08:37:22 PM
- 957 Views
Re:
18/11/2012 11:07:17 PM
- 1163 Views
Re:
19/11/2012 05:16:00 AM
- 989 Views
Re:
19/11/2012 03:13:01 PM
- 995 Views
They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 03:19:19 PM
- 997 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 04:01:43 PM
- 1204 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
19/11/2012 09:04:04 PM
- 950 Views
Hmmm...
20/11/2012 02:08:40 AM
- 1016 Views
Perhaps, but Egwene is also being a bit dramatic in the scene as she managed
20/11/2012 04:28:57 AM
- 974 Views
Nope...
20/11/2012 03:13:13 PM
- 1025 Views
I believe she is being over dramatic
20/11/2012 03:26:24 PM
- 923 Views
Keep believing that...
20/11/2012 03:30:14 PM
- 1051 Views
*shrugs*
20/11/2012 03:49:10 PM
- 1003 Views
Tired and forkroot are the same now?
20/11/2012 03:55:22 PM
- 909 Views
No it's the literary device
20/11/2012 04:04:28 PM
- 1029 Views
Impossible. Daigian is exactly 0.32SD below the mean
19/11/2012 11:06:04 AM
- 973 Views
You keep saying that, but it is either a linear or a non-linear distribution
19/11/2012 09:09:32 PM
- 1030 Views
That's the whole point. Thanks for finally seeing it.
19/11/2012 09:43:27 PM
- 991 Views
keep believing that ... but you making up numbers isn't really relevant *NM*
20/11/2012 04:29:44 AM
- 653 Views
Please show me a number that is made up. The 0.32SD for Daigian is a rule of statistics.
20/11/2012 07:15:48 AM
- 954 Views
Ugh. I hate power level discussions. For real world applications, it should be kind of meaningless
16/11/2012 10:28:49 PM
- 943 Views
I don't really agree
18/11/2012 08:40:53 PM
- 888 Views
Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
19/11/2012 09:13:48 PM
- 959 Views
Re: Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
20/11/2012 08:10:01 AM
- 930 Views
Since I've proven that it's not a normal distribution in units of absolute strength, SDs don't apply
17/11/2012 07:48:21 PM
- 989 Views
You have proven nothing, except that you have an opinion *NM*
18/11/2012 02:21:35 AM
- 636 Views
You simply don't get it. It is mathematically a fact. There is no opinion involved.
18/11/2012 02:19:40 PM
- 833 Views
Only because you've assigned numeric values. That you created.
18/11/2012 02:40:51 PM
- 958 Views
It doesn't matter what figure you use...
18/11/2012 03:01:56 PM
- 837 Views
What if Daigian is one third Lanfear's strength?
18/11/2012 04:37:58 PM
- 979 Views
Sure you can
18/11/2012 10:09:31 PM
- 991 Views
Re: Sure you can
18/11/2012 10:54:50 PM
- 940 Views
You're right, though its 37.5%
19/11/2012 12:21:29 AM
- 905 Views
Oops, typo!
19/11/2012 02:54:25 AM
- 975 Views
Again, not possible, due to Daigian being just 0.3SD below the Mean
19/11/2012 08:37:01 AM
- 928 Views
Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
19/11/2012 04:05:12 PM
- 870 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
19/11/2012 05:55:02 PM
- 798 Views
Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
19/11/2012 09:19:50 PM
- 915 Views
Re: Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
20/11/2012 02:11:26 AM
- 943 Views
Forkroot in every case
20/11/2012 04:32:26 AM
- 924 Views
No!
20/11/2012 03:15:16 PM
- 907 Views
I'm not going to go re-read the books to you on this
20/11/2012 03:39:46 PM
- 923 Views
You need to read it for yourself, since you're completely confused.
20/11/2012 03:54:26 PM
- 888 Views
Not going to argue this with you.
20/11/2012 04:09:44 PM
- 861 Views
Your own example disproved your point...
20/11/2012 04:39:25 PM
- 952 Views
let's see, she's both asleep and would need hours to regain her strength
20/11/2012 04:43:17 PM
- 848 Views
Enough!
20/11/2012 05:04:06 PM
- 936 Views
LOL ... whatever. You go on believing that ... no one else sees it this way. *NM*
20/11/2012 05:20:52 PM
- 623 Views
Re: Your own example disproved your point...
20/11/2012 05:10:15 PM
- 981 Views
Barasine + Katerine isn't that much less than
20/11/2012 05:26:31 PM
- 983 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 02:26:47 AM
- 857 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 09:03:40 AM
- 905 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
20/11/2012 02:59:08 PM
- 941 Views
None of this is backed by any evidence...
20/11/2012 03:24:12 PM
- 858 Views
who said Cadsuane was 1.5x Moiraine or more?
20/11/2012 04:03:13 PM
- 860 Views
Nope...
20/11/2012 04:41:35 PM
- 902 Views
wrong
20/11/2012 04:48:50 PM
- 835 Views
Better evidence? LOL!
20/11/2012 03:18:55 PM
- 907 Views
Huh? How did you come to that conclusion?
20/11/2012 04:40:56 PM
- 899 Views
BEcause Cadsuane is close on the heels of Egwene?
20/11/2012 05:10:50 PM
- 816 Views
I'm not arguing that. I agree that Cadsuane is pretty close to Egwene
20/11/2012 05:50:34 PM
- 921 Views
Interesting, but let's go with your figures...
19/11/2012 06:54:54 AM
- 971 Views
Indeed
19/11/2012 08:16:44 AM
- 1010 Views
Rand is sort of a special case
20/11/2012 04:25:02 AM
- 835 Views
Regarding Mesaana...
20/11/2012 08:42:56 AM
- 908 Views
You continue to mix two things
20/11/2012 03:24:44 PM
- 837 Views
No
20/11/2012 04:54:19 PM
- 1058 Views
You are mistaken
20/11/2012 05:04:40 PM
- 918 Views
Probably, but the AS have no idea what 37.5% means
19/11/2012 02:59:26 AM
- 862 Views
It's irrelevant
19/11/2012 03:46:42 AM
- 931 Views
Agreed. Daigian is the marker of the absolute bottom of Aes Sedai strength.
19/11/2012 06:55:41 AM
- 898 Views
Daigian
19/11/2012 08:12:19 AM
- 919 Views
It is a direct marker due to RJ's quote
19/11/2012 08:50:26 AM
- 943 Views
You missed my point
19/11/2012 09:08:42 AM
- 879 Views
Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
20/11/2012 04:41:11 AM
- 886 Views
Re: Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
20/11/2012 09:07:49 AM
- 862 Views
Re: Sure you can
19/11/2012 09:22:09 AM
- 1007 Views
Care to explain this...
19/11/2012 05:06:28 PM
- 848 Views
Indeed
20/11/2012 07:16:37 AM
- 1069 Views
Explained far better than I ever could. Bravo.
20/11/2012 07:30:29 AM
- 884 Views
Well duh.
20/11/2012 02:57:24 PM
- 992 Views
Incorrect.
20/11/2012 04:28:07 PM
- 978 Views
No
20/11/2012 04:44:16 PM
- 954 Views
You're integrating without lower limits...
20/11/2012 02:55:06 PM
- 929 Views
We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
20/11/2012 04:44:24 AM
- 771 Views
Re: We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
20/11/2012 07:02:47 AM
- 961 Views
You must tell me of this special math...
20/11/2012 03:10:09 PM
- 858 Views
Re: You must tell me of this special math...
20/11/2012 04:29:40 PM
- 894 Views
Morghase is a placeholder...
20/11/2012 04:45:42 PM
- 962 Views
Well...
18/11/2012 08:43:59 PM
- 994 Views
Re: Well...
19/11/2012 03:40:44 PM
- 975 Views
Wow.
19/11/2012 03:53:47 PM
- 1018 Views
Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
19/11/2012 06:09:36 PM
- 870 Views
Re: Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
19/11/2012 07:42:58 PM
- 771 Views
this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
20/11/2012 04:51:20 AM
- 965 Views
Re: this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
20/11/2012 02:45:18 PM
- 906 Views
I think RJ went out of his way to keep strength a bit of a mystery
20/11/2012 08:42:44 PM
- 914 Views
Math gurus...Is it possible to find the missing variable...
21/11/2012 05:12:24 PM
- 914 Views
the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
22/11/2012 02:55:03 AM
- 981 Views
Re: the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
22/11/2012 03:15:33 AM
- 1267 Views
I do not think you can calculate the Mean without knowing the Units of Power
22/11/2012 03:53:59 AM
- 1069 Views