Active Users:366 Time:05/04/2025 04:00:47 AM
Exactly... Shannow Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM
This validates my point (which you have completely disagreed with before) that Aes Sedai make a terrible random sampling. They're a very skewed sample, and the best example of that is the 1000 novices Egwene's proclamation brings.


RJ said that 62.5% of women were strong enough to become Aes Sedai, yet only 20% of Egwene's 1000 novices are strong enough. What possible explanation could there be for this enormous bias?


Even if Aes Sedai only pick up a small percentage of all potential channelers, there is still no logical reason under the sun why this small sample should be so biased towards the weaker side of the Mean.

The sample should still represent the distribution of the larger population it was drawn from.
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1490 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 884 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1452 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 893 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 801 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 752 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 765 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 764 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 782 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 811 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 712 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 690 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 716 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 867 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 729 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 667 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 671 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 770 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 668 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 761 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 682 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 698 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 698 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 692 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1364 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 948 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 723 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 653 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1391 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 912 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 701 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 637 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 724 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 811 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 375 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 737 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 698 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 701 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 768 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 775 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 796 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 840 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 799 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 823 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 407 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 746 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 681 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 804 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 635 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1286 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 734 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 739 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 681 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 882 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 806 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 806 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 712 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 1002 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 817 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 702 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 827 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 878 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 813 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 782 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 794 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 770 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 792 Views

Reply to Message