Active Users:361 Time:05/04/2025 04:06:46 AM
So what's your conclusion? Shannow Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 02:14:33 PM
The bell curve is not a hypothesis. It is fact. Your failure to understand this is at the root of your completely outdated strength list.


Brandon even told me at signing (well, rather the guy beside me who had asked him that) he'd seen the graphs RJ made in the notes...

RJ obviously used this as a tool to loosely distribute larger groups of characters.

There probably is an higher percentage of rarer strengths on both sides among WO and WF, simply because the ability is more common among them (they've not culled out the female gene pool among sparkers the way AS have done, and both group marry and have children).

For the rest, all evidence points to strength coming exclusively from the soul (what happened to Lanfear, discrediting the hypothesis it was a body issue ought to put that debate to rest. There's no oddity with Rand, nor with any of the transmigrated Forsaken who all have their exact old strength), so the bell curve would be very close to the AOL's, but in practice I'm guessing it would be very different as the percentage of women whose ability is found is incredibly low (tens of thousand aren't found in the Westlands alone), and the ability is less present in various groups because of culling. I suck at statistics, but my feeling is that the sample among AS at least is probably so small in comparison to Westlands women with the ability, that how the women get found is so random (relying massively on women deciding to go being tested... and they have such a small window of opportunity to make that decision...) there would be tons of aberrations, for e.g. for a few hundreds years, on a sample of only 1000 women, very few subjects with the rare strengths might show up at all.

How come women of Graendal's strength are so rare? Well, how many Graendal are there supposed to be anyway, in the current overall human population? A few hundreds, thousands, less?

We have no idea how big the SF population is, the Aiel are numerous. Those are the only two groups who find and train all their women, but both would have a lower percentage of channellers being born than in the AOL, as they cull male sparkers. In the Westlands it's worse thanks to AS culling out both male and female sparkers.

In Seanchan, they're also culling out male and female sparkers, and even more thoroughly than in the Westlands as all damane are found. The majority of their channelers, however, are never found (as channelers... they become sul'dam instead).

It would mean women in the rarer levels (high and low) would show and most of them are never found. Occasionally, a few of those would show up, like Talaan or the strongest WO.

Finally, there's a factor that is too overlooked: the Pattern.

It's rather obvious the White Tower has been "managed" by the Wheel. If its numbers have dwindled, and its average strength plummet, it's obviously in preparation for the LB. Souls have been kept in reserve for the LB era. It's no coincidence Siuan, Elaida, Aviendha, Elayne, Egwene, Nyaneve, Cadsuane, Moiraine all have the proper strengths to play their roles. The WT has lacked strong recruits for many hundreds years, and suddenly they return... tons of novices above average, some like Sharina from the very rare levels etc. The SF has some too, the Seanchan (like Alivia), the WO. All at the right time.

Let's not forget the Shadow once had 50% of all channellers and nearly won. It's no coincidence the current crop of channelers were extremely unattractive to the Shadow, if they had showed up and too early, Forsaken like Be'lal, Moghedien and Graendal would have snatched them up and train them as weapon, the Generals would have been more tempted to recruit and train, Ishamael would have put a lot more efforts into converting channelers to the Shadow. Etc. The whole "it's not worth it, too much work to train properly such women, not enough angreal to provide them decent strength" factors must have played out to an extent (instead of training them as fighters, Moridin used the BA as a political organ, not worrying overly about strength and training etc.).



Is Moiraine half as strong as Lanfear?
Reply to message
Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 24/10/2012 06:40:47 PM 2851 Views
Did Perva actually initiate the link or was it Androl? *NM* - 24/10/2012 07:02:15 PM 721 Views
Androl did. *NM* - 25/10/2012 05:10:31 AM 977 Views
But didn't Nynaeve do it first at the cleansing? - 25/10/2012 12:43:15 PM 1183 Views
Pevara was thinking on very sketchy information. - 25/10/2012 08:56:20 PM 1109 Views
did he start the link? or just take it? - 27/10/2012 07:33:49 AM 835 Views
I think it's slightly off - 28/10/2012 04:21:05 PM 1109 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 05:13:43 AM 1333 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 04:23:20 PM 1154 Views
Re: Ch2 : Pevara & Androl and channeling implications - 25/10/2012 09:52:03 PM 1198 Views
Travelling - 25/10/2012 08:56:41 AM 1199 Views
Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 04:21:53 PM 1212 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 06:12:21 PM 1091 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 08:50:15 PM 1047 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 25/10/2012 09:45:26 PM 1132 Views
Weren't there 150 or so at Maradon? *NM* - 26/10/2012 03:29:53 PM 634 Views
Re: Yes that's a pet theory of mine - 26/10/2012 08:49:58 PM 1252 Views
Perhaps, but if no on in the AoL could do it when mixed circles were common - 28/10/2012 04:22:20 PM 931 Views
How strong Pevara is... - 25/10/2012 07:08:26 PM 1273 Views
I'm pretty sure Moiraine is closer to 30... - 25/10/2012 07:41:37 PM 997 Views
Agreed - 25/10/2012 08:37:24 PM 1087 Views
So... the old story of ignore the bell curve, eh? - 26/10/2012 01:40:49 AM 1047 Views
No, I fully respect the bell curve - 26/10/2012 01:51:34 PM 1104 Views
That was disproved long ago... - 26/10/2012 01:36:24 AM 1057 Views
But Moiraine isn't 'exceptionally strong' - 26/10/2012 05:16:10 AM 1103 Views
Not particularly strong evidence for that last. - 26/10/2012 05:36:54 AM 1051 Views
But we know that it takes significantly more strength to maintain multiple weaves - 26/10/2012 08:14:58 AM 963 Views
Not true - 27/10/2012 09:15:51 PM 972 Views
Not accurate - 27/10/2012 09:31:05 PM 970 Views
The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 10:27:34 AM 1031 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 11:40:04 AM 1023 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:32:01 PM 959 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 12:48:51 PM 1052 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:07:39 PM 1050 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:18:32 PM 1057 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 26/10/2012 01:57:18 PM 1117 Views
Re: The Bell Curve explained... - 28/10/2012 02:07:39 PM 786 Views
Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 27/10/2012 09:39:58 PM 1131 Views
The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 01:50:37 AM 919 Views
Re: The curve is OBVIOUSLY the same... - 28/10/2012 02:01:59 PM 999 Views
You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 02:41:49 PM 1019 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 28/10/2012 05:39:12 PM 921 Views
I need to come and save you from blatant fallacies being spouted by the loonies. - 28/10/2012 05:56:21 PM 935 Views
This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 02:58:51 AM 892 Views
Re: This is like watching a train-wreck. - 29/10/2012 01:10:35 PM 1103 Views
So what's your conclusion? - 29/10/2012 02:14:33 PM 875 Views
His conclusion is that RJ was right about the books he wrote... - 29/10/2012 02:19:59 PM 1023 Views
Pretty much... - 30/10/2012 12:57:41 AM 1100 Views
Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:16:39 PM 861 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 29/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 994 Views
You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:22:47 PM 878 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 03:41:48 PM 930 Views
I think the point is that the AS didn't go force every woman in the area - 29/10/2012 07:57:59 PM 872 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:23:22 PM 1005 Views
Re: You seem confused. - 29/10/2012 08:57:11 PM 1013 Views
He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 12:49:09 AM 896 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 07:43:54 AM 945 Views
Re: He drew graphs! - 30/10/2012 01:57:05 PM 926 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:00 AM 943 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 07:49:57 AM 963 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:05:45 PM 1293 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 01:25:11 PM 976 Views
Re: Excellent points... - 30/10/2012 12:20:17 AM 1040 Views
AS recruiting is minimal - 28/10/2012 10:41:29 PM 929 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 02:23:27 AM 932 Views
Re: You need to go read RJ's quotes: - 29/10/2012 07:33:44 AM 923 Views
Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:26:27 PM 928 Views
Re: Huh? - 29/10/2012 02:42:07 PM 911 Views
You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:25:57 PM 914 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 03:36:45 PM 945 Views
Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 08:05:33 PM 956 Views
Re: Personally I just think that 1000 women being allowed to tag along is a drop - 29/10/2012 09:04:02 PM 981 Views
Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 12:39:53 AM 924 Views
Re: Geography alone can do this - 30/10/2012 09:45:58 AM 908 Views
Not really - 30/10/2012 02:49:05 PM 888 Views
Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:04:18 AM 894 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 09:42:35 AM 1038 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 01:51:03 PM 888 Views
Re: Here's why its not random... - 30/10/2012 02:21:04 PM 934 Views
YEah, there's no point debating this... - 30/10/2012 02:46:39 PM 883 Views
Genetics plays a role - 30/10/2012 03:03:41 PM 1037 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 08:22:40 PM 882 Views
Re: You don't seem to know what random means... - 29/10/2012 09:06:08 PM 917 Views
Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 01:06:29 AM 903 Views
Re: Why must there be a mechanism? - 30/10/2012 09:48:16 AM 825 Views
Nope... - 30/10/2012 01:43:56 PM 1036 Views
Re: Nope... - 30/10/2012 02:34:51 PM 882 Views
Oh my... - 30/10/2012 02:50:12 PM 958 Views
Thought experment time! Hurrah! - 30/10/2012 03:27:01 PM 901 Views
But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:30:59 PM 833 Views
Re: But it is still possible in your example to get wildly varied results - 30/10/2012 03:36:03 PM 936 Views
LOL - 30/10/2012 04:49:06 PM 1451 Views
Re: Yet Sharina, Nynaeve etc exist, thus the BC is the same - 28/10/2012 01:39:55 PM 892 Views
The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 04:18:55 PM 937 Views
Re: The point is there are still people being born in the highest strength categories - 28/10/2012 05:21:44 PM 932 Views
The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 05:39:42 PM 1007 Views
The fact is, Moiraine is not half as strong as Lanfear, hence she is below average strength. - 28/10/2012 06:02:04 PM 954 Views
How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 02:59:49 AM 951 Views
Re: How is this fact? - 29/10/2012 07:04:15 PM 941 Views
Not so - 29/10/2012 08:09:29 PM 906 Views
Re: Not so - 29/10/2012 08:43:16 PM 983 Views
Sure it is - 30/10/2012 01:43:39 AM 869 Views
Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:20:14 PM 912 Views
Re: Explain Elza-Merise-Cadsuane then... - 29/10/2012 08:38:11 PM 928 Views
Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 01:12:26 AM 953 Views
Re: Are you blind man? - 30/10/2012 09:23:37 AM 983 Views
Cadsuane is just below Egwene... - 30/10/2012 01:37:54 PM 914 Views
Your strength scores don't square with the Pevara quote - 30/10/2012 03:15:22 PM 917 Views
Re: The curve hasn't shifted! - 28/10/2012 07:36:36 PM 935 Views
On Raw strength scores I think you are pretty inline with my thinking - 27/10/2012 09:37:25 PM 1088 Views
And the facing a Foresaken comment is out of context anyway... - 28/10/2012 01:56:12 AM 1037 Views
Excellent point on raw v. Effective strength *NM* - 28/10/2012 04:13:21 PM 632 Views

Reply to Message