Active Users:473 Time:25/11/2024 11:02:15 PM
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well... Tor Send a noteboard - 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM
I cannot comment on their state of mind. They dogmatically try and fit the data into the Bell Curve distribution, which simply cannot apply in the way that they wish it to. The evidence refutes it.


I get the impression that what they are disputing is that the distribution of strengths has changed since the Age of Legends.
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 09:44:09 AM 1431 Views
Re: The Bell Curve revisited - 29/10/2012 10:21:27 AM 821 Views
That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:26:49 AM 1389 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:36:32 AM 835 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:40:27 AM 684 Views
Re: That's incorrect... - 29/10/2012 10:42:57 AM 680 Views
Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well... - 29/10/2012 10:45:07 AM 769 Views
Re: Hehe...There are a few disputing it vocally. Whether they're in their right mind, well... - 29/10/2012 10:49:49 AM 662 Views
RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:11:19 PM 719 Views
Response to a few of your poorly researched points... - 29/10/2012 02:31:17 PM 696 Views
Re: RJ the physicist didn't know math, so that Shannow could be right... - 29/10/2012 02:37:33 PM 711 Views
Exactly... - 29/10/2012 02:39:30 PM 702 Views
there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 08:18:18 PM 725 Views
Excellent point. - 29/10/2012 08:24:37 PM 753 Views
Re: there are dozens of reasons for this - 29/10/2012 09:07:35 PM 653 Views
Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 01:57:24 AM 625 Views
Re: Again I don't argue that genetics play no role - 30/10/2012 07:07:17 AM 656 Views
I don't think it plays much role in the plot - 30/10/2012 03:17:55 PM 800 Views
Once again just so,we are clear on my stance with Genetics and Strength - 30/10/2012 03:27:11 PM 674 Views
That the 1000 Novices aren't a random sample of the population? - 29/10/2012 08:23:47 PM 610 Views
And why would it be biased towards those with lower strength? - 29/10/2012 09:11:25 PM 603 Views
Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 01:35:35 AM 715 Views
Re: Absolutely no reason... - 30/10/2012 06:43:54 AM 612 Views
Only if it was a random sampling. Which this is not. - 30/10/2012 01:58:34 PM 689 Views
That's exactly the point. I want you to explain why it wasn't random. - 30/10/2012 02:14:59 PM 617 Views
It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:43:03 PM 636 Views
Re: It wasn't random because it was a self-selected sample! - 30/10/2012 02:47:30 PM 638 Views
Go read a stats text will you? - 30/10/2012 02:54:16 PM 631 Views
Done - 31/10/2012 09:34:11 AM 1303 Views
You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 10/11/2012 10:14:19 PM 882 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 11:37:16 AM 685 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 07:14:48 PM 579 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:33:59 PM 1325 Views
Re: You seem to have perfected whining to a Talent... - 11/11/2012 08:43:19 PM 845 Views
Still nothing? - 10/11/2012 03:33:15 PM 642 Views
Still doesn't explain the difference - 30/10/2012 07:01:53 PM 581 Views
Re: Still doesn't explain the difference - 10/11/2012 10:21:00 PM 663 Views
Yes that totally makes sense - 30/10/2012 08:07:16 AM 754 Views
Thank you! *NM* - 30/10/2012 10:19:15 AM 346 Views
That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:01:52 PM 672 Views
Re: That's not what happened... - 30/10/2012 02:15:57 PM 630 Views
Who said it would? - 30/10/2012 02:44:17 PM 644 Views
let's not mix up "random" and "representative" - 30/10/2012 05:28:09 PM 691 Views
Doesn't mean RJ applied it to his series - 30/10/2012 08:23:29 AM 709 Views
But of course he did.. - 30/10/2012 02:13:07 PM 736 Views
I hate to get into these things - 29/10/2012 05:45:50 PM 784 Views
I would love for you to be right, because it would solve all our problems, but 0 is the challenge... - 29/10/2012 07:56:34 PM 724 Views
In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 08:20:52 PM 765 Views
Overwhelm Lanfear, not match her. *NM* - 29/10/2012 08:26:09 PM 379 Views
Truth is, Moiraine was being overly optimistic... - 29/10/2012 08:39:17 PM 689 Views
You're pathetic... - 30/10/2012 01:20:01 AM 620 Views
The quote isn't specific - 30/10/2012 08:32:36 AM 740 Views
Its highly specific... - 30/10/2012 02:15:38 PM 571 Views
Yet neither of them are at full potential and at least equal a Forsaken - 30/10/2012 03:45:24 PM 1229 Views
Honestly! - 30/10/2012 02:07:37 AM 671 Views
Re: In the truest sense, you are probably right that it is skewed - 29/10/2012 09:10:27 PM 672 Views
Lots of people mean perfectly normal distribution when they say it - 30/10/2012 05:25:35 PM 626 Views
Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 12:04:01 AM 809 Views
Re: Couldn't the Towers method of obtaining Aes Sedai be to blame? - 30/10/2012 09:33:44 AM 741 Views
Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:03:43 PM 742 Views
Re: Are you sure about that? - 30/10/2012 12:19:34 PM 655 Views
That doesn't seem a coherent narrative to me - 30/10/2012 04:26:25 PM 937 Views
Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:16:40 PM 750 Views
Re: Sharina did not have the Spark, nor did Nicola - 30/10/2012 05:54:41 PM 641 Views
We do not know if Cadsuane or any of the Forsaken are Sparkers - 30/10/2012 10:33:55 PM 767 Views
you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 04:27:32 AM 802 Views
+1 *NM* - 30/10/2012 09:17:07 AM 734 Views
Re: you're confusing 2 things - 30/10/2012 09:21:39 AM 727 Views
Not true... - 30/10/2012 11:49:57 AM 752 Views
One thing - 30/10/2012 05:23:17 PM 716 Views
That's the problem. The BC RJ has "built" has a minimum and a maximum value - 30/10/2012 05:48:55 PM 730 Views

Reply to Message