I'm not some literary analyst or good at picking out details, and this is one of the few definite things I can say bothers me about Sanderson's writing. It's got nothing to do with the word itself so much as how it's used and Sanderson uses it where the same character would say "man" or "woman".
WoT has a very strong sense of gender identity, and Sanderson has completely missed that, retaining the modern usage.
WoT has a very strong sense of gender identity, and Sanderson has completely missed that, retaining the modern usage.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
AMoL Prologue: DAMMIT SANDERSON! They are MEN and WOMEN, not PERSONS!!!!!!!
- 19/09/2012 10:25:42 PM
1498 Views
Agreed. And isn't people the plural for person? *NM*
- 19/09/2012 10:50:22 PM
337 Views
My point would have been lost, since "people" is used in WoT-proper for mixed groups. *NM*
- 19/09/2012 11:12:58 PM
309 Views
Tell me, honestly.
- 20/09/2012 01:52:41 AM
1198 Views
Contractions
- 20/09/2012 05:16:56 AM
879 Views
Oh Terez,
- 20/09/2012 05:36:23 AM
903 Views
100% Death of Narg *NM*
- 20/09/2012 06:03:06 AM
309 Views
*NM*
It's how they're used and by whom
- 20/09/2012 12:01:35 PM
973 Views
I kinda felt the same way about his use of "squished" in the first paragraph of the book. meh *NM*
- 21/09/2012 06:49:58 AM
451 Views