By the books are structured the way they are there is suspense and stuff like that. Reading chronologically could ruin that.
"I mean, if everyone had a soul, there would be no contrast by which we could appreciate it. For giving us this perspective, we thank you." - Nate
Post-aMoL, will someone assemble a chronological way to read the final three books as one?
- 07/06/2012 04:48:34 PM
3574 Views
Why it "might be worthwhile"? *NM*
- 07/06/2012 11:20:59 PM
493 Views
Because the way tGS and ToM currently work together feels anti-climactic.
- 08/06/2012 03:26:58 PM
855 Views
I hate the edit/reply button positioning... ugh. User error. *NM*
- 08/06/2012 03:44:53 PM
481 Views
Bah. Five years into lurking/posting and I still mess this up. *NM*
- 08/06/2012 03:45:28 PM
538 Views
Probably not. Sounds lame
- 08/06/2012 02:56:22 AM
776 Views
It's not going to happen, but how is it lame? It's how RJ intended the story to be. *NM*
- 10/06/2012 10:26:53 PM
381 Views
We'll have to wait and see how much AMoL overlaps with the other two books.
- 08/06/2012 01:46:15 PM
914 Views
Shouldn't be done.
- 09/06/2012 01:40:51 PM
968 Views
I believe the point is that BS's structure ruined the story somewhat
- 09/06/2012 01:53:29 PM
818 Views
The books were meant to be chronological. Their splitting changed that. *NM*
- 10/06/2012 10:26:22 PM
2587 Views
*NM*
Sanderson actually stated on Twitter quite some time ago that he had considered doing this.
- 11/06/2012 03:18:26 PM
807 Views