Active Users:1128 Time:23/11/2024 04:56:33 AM
Because that was the important part of that post. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM
You know what? Fine, you win. I'm done with this.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 1881 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 897 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 842 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 863 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 767 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 847 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 977 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 425 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 876 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1078 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 832 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 822 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 766 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 800 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1050 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 754 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 718 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 665 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 774 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 833 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 768 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 884 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 846 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 875 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 669 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 625 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 812 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 656 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 797 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 691 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 697 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 879 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 657 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 668 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 746 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 728 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 698 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 675 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 845 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 710 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 792 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 810 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 682 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 774 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 681 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 846 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 633 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 664 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 667 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 792 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 585 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 839 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 890 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 776 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 393 Views

Reply to Message