... that if people die thousands of years after Rand's time, because of decisions made by people who lived long after his death, it's Rand's fault? Do you think the remnant of a remnant will live eternally then?
Honestly. Descendants happen when your people survive.
I'm referring to the possibility that the Remnant are a deliberately chosen group of people (as in SAVED). What happens to those who do not choose to follow the Dragon's Peace looks to be extinction. Their death is not the fault of the Dragon. It looks to be the fault of their choice to continue to deny their heritage as followers of The Way. Just as these people die in war the remnant and their descendants will live and thrive assuming they accept the Peace and stand aside from the war. This is not a difficult concept to understand.
But just in case, let's recap. Prophesy says the Aiel will be broken and destroyed EXCEPT for the remnant Rand will save. Aviendha's vision showed a large group of Aiel dying out due to fighting a war they could not win. This does not go against the Prophesy, as long as there are a remnant of the Aiel who do not participate in the war. If that remnant was saved by Rand (presumably because the chose to go back to The Way) then we have a viable reason Aviendha's vision is not false.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan
03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM
- 1881 Views
The entire point, I believe, is to give Avienda the opportunity to change that future
03/04/2012 05:13:48 PM
- 1139 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM
- 897 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel
04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM
- 842 Views
There are more than there were before.
04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM
- 863 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers
04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM
- 768 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM
- 847 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM
- 977 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM
- 876 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM
- 1078 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM
- 766 Views
Re: Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
06/04/2012 12:20:31 AM
- 872 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM
- 1050 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM
- 754 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM
- 718 Views
So what you're saying...
07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM
- 665 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel
08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM
- 774 Views
I never said it was.
08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM
- 833 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been
08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM
- 768 Views
No...
08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM
- 884 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM
- 846 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM
- 875 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM
- 669 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could
08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM
- 812 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake.
09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM
- 657 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel
10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM
- 797 Views
No. They are not.
10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM
- 691 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel
10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
- 698 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible.
10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
- 879 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel
10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM
- 657 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant.
10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM
- 668 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM
- 746 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM
- 728 Views
That is what I just said
14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM
- 698 Views
What is important about that?
14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM
- 675 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
- 845 Views
So what you're saying is...
14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM
- 710 Views
That's exactly it
14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
- 793 Views
Good.
15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM
- 810 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it
15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM
- 682 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever.
15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM
- 774 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM
- 681 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM
- 846 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was...
17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM
- 664 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years?
18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM
- 667 Views