Active Users:1121 Time:23/11/2024 05:03:05 AM
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
No one thinks the remnant of a remnant will die ...


The relevant part is that it contrasts the remnant of the remnant with the rest of the Aiel. If the remnant is distinct in that they shall live, then what do you think that makes the others?


Will SAVE THEM ... Not that they will survive or that they will be the ONLY survivors Rand saves, only that a remnant of the Aiel will be part of those he saves. The rest will obviously die out, but that does not mean they will die immediately following TG. We heard Aviendha's vision speak of the "Peace of the Dragon" and we then saw the Aiel of the Waste break that peace and ultimately die out. There is no mention at all of possible people who honored the Peace (i.e. went back to The Way) and thus represent the remnant spoken of in the Prophesy. In short I am saying it is possible that the remnant of the Aiel in the Prophesy will go on to be part of a new larger group who honor the Peace of the Dragon and are in essence the "reborn Aiel".
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
This message last edited by darius_sedai on 14/04/2012 at 06:08:51 PM
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 1882 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 897 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 842 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 864 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 768 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 847 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 977 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 425 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 876 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1078 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 832 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 822 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 767 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 800 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1050 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 754 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 718 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 665 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 774 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 833 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 768 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 885 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 846 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 875 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 669 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 626 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 812 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 657 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 797 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 691 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 698 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 879 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 657 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 668 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 746 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 728 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 698 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 676 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 846 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 710 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 793 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 810 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 682 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 774 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 681 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 846 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 633 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 664 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 667 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 792 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 585 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 839 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 890 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 776 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 393 Views

Reply to Message