Active Users:344 Time:05/04/2025 03:33:10 AM
nope HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
Have you ever actually swung a sowrd at someone or had one swung at you? From your statements, I'd hazard a guess that the answer is "no"

Any SCA folks on the boards want to weigh in on the value of armor, cause folks just aint beleiving me when I say that knowing you are not going to get cut up like a meatloaf matters. Light-weight (less material needed) yet resiliant (C is unbreakable) IS the holy grail of armoring. Always has been, always will be and the improvement of C over steel/iron is anything but marginal.


Look elsewhere for my opinion of C weapons, in a nutshell, they have no benefit unless you have modern computer controlled manufacuting techniques (able to make micrometer fine edges), and even then the benifit is slight because you need some mass behind the weapon.

Not sure of your impracticls criteria. I have discussed manufacturing elsewhere, and it is very simple, even full plate becomes much easier because the much thinner sheets allows shaping around forms to bechilds play, especially since you do not have to worry about temper.

Summation: It is easier to make armor plates that are intended to be transformed, and the final product would be much more effective. In my book that makes it a "no-brainer"
Reply to message
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible? - 10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM 1479 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM 942 Views
You busted him! I wonder why he would post it again... *NM* - 10/02/2012 07:25:47 PM 497 Views
I suppose I am on a... - 10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM 842 Views
No, you go back and re-read what everyone said. - 11/02/2012 11:02:47 PM 943 Views
We're actually losing them by the troves. My apologies. *NM* - 12/02/2012 02:52:01 AM 455 Views
I rest my case. - 10/05/2012 04:34:02 PM 834 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion - 11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM 1030 Views
Agreed. - 11/02/2012 06:24:36 PM 825 Views
why not some plate armor. duh. *NM* - 12/02/2012 09:54:43 PM 493 Views
See? - 10/05/2012 04:35:25 PM 808 Views
Possible, but hard. - 11/02/2012 01:56:03 AM 950 Views
scale or plate armor would be quite easy *NM* - 11/02/2012 01:38:47 PM 423 Views
My thought was always about weapons. - 11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM 1003 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 12/02/2012 10:51:43 AM 876 Views
Re: My thought was always about weapons. - 14/02/2012 01:53:59 PM 846 Views
Should be perfectly feasible - 11/02/2012 12:28:47 PM 842 Views
Exactly - 11/02/2012 01:53:24 PM 879 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item - 12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM 927 Views
Ummm, Warders... - 14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM 772 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers? - 14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM 847 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP - 14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM 734 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM 872 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such. - 14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM 721 Views
which way is it? - 15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM 736 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power - 15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM 851 Views
That's really not my point. - 15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM 731 Views
My point is - 15/02/2012 03:52:43 PM 718 Views
Agree on all points *NM* - 15/02/2012 07:06:09 PM 570 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped - 15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM 836 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be. - 15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM 782 Views
Not nesecarrily - 15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM 784 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect. - 15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM 891 Views
..and you are creating new tactics - 15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM 725 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action - 15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM 744 Views
Not accurate - 15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM 846 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box - 15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM 819 Views
I disagree - 15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM 778 Views
If armor is of no benefit... - 15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM 687 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless - 15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM 794 Views
nope - 15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM 708 Views
*Shrug* - 15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM 839 Views
Re: *Shrug* - 15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM 1000 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP - 15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM 720 Views
Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM 706 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not - 15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM 857 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones" - 15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM 740 Views
Fair enough. - 16/02/2012 02:08:19 AM 737 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor... - 13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM 911 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error - 14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM 724 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p - 14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM 710 Views
here ya go, I still skipped almost all of the math though. - 15/02/2012 03:00:09 PM 778 Views
Two things: *NM* - 16/02/2012 04:03:52 PM 460 Views

Reply to Message