Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
Nargs Send a noteboard - 10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
The armor might not provide that much protection to hard hits, but it would definitely help protect against punctures.
If you support this idea, why? What prevents it from protecting against bludgeoning?
This message last edited by Nargs on 10/02/2012 at 11:10:49 PM
Functional Cuendillar Armor: Possible or impossible?
10/02/2012 04:45:34 PM
- 1407 Views
You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 06:29:28 PM
- 852 Views
I suppose I am on a...
10/02/2012 11:00:47 PM
- 757 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
10/02/2012 11:04:33 PM
- 904 Views
Re: You posted this exact same question one year ago, with a lot of discussion
11/02/2012 01:37:27 PM
- 949 Views
My thought was always about weapons.
11/02/2012 06:31:45 AM
- 922 Views
Certainly possible, but given the effort most women have to put toward changing even a small item
12/02/2012 05:10:35 AM
- 844 Views
Ummm, Warders...
14/02/2012 01:39:23 PM
- 687 Views
How would Cuendillar armour help against channelers?
14/02/2012 07:58:58 PM
- 756 Views
It can not be directly effected by the OP
14/02/2012 09:08:57 PM
- 657 Views
some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 09:52:41 PM
- 798 Views
Re: some simple ideas for defeating warders armoured such.
14/02/2012 10:54:26 PM
- 641 Views
which way is it?
15/02/2012 04:14:41 AM
- 656 Views
Actually I'd call the Seanchan tactically inferior to the White Tower in using the power
15/02/2012 01:48:55 PM
- 772 Views
That's really not my point.
15/02/2012 03:21:15 PM
- 646 Views
I never said that they could not be stopped
15/02/2012 01:58:41 PM
- 746 Views
I really think you're over-estimating how difficult it would be.
15/02/2012 03:22:44 PM
- 685 Views
Not nesecarrily
15/02/2012 04:01:45 PM
- 699 Views
You just said that most of their tactics are indirect.
15/02/2012 05:44:22 PM
- 801 Views
..and you are creating new tactics
15/02/2012 06:32:02 PM
- 641 Views
*shrug* I don't see it as some world-shaking action
15/02/2012 08:47:40 PM
- 659 Views
But it is brand new, and if you're digging holes earth-shaking seems discriptive
15/02/2012 09:14:12 PM
- 689 Views
Not accurate
15/02/2012 03:54:00 PM
- 750 Views
You are thinking too far inside the box
15/02/2012 04:23:28 PM
- 735 Views
I disagree
15/02/2012 04:43:33 PM
- 698 Views
If armor is of no benefit...
15/02/2012 06:19:30 PM
- 604 Views
Missing my point ... Cuendillar armor is impractical not useless
15/02/2012 07:00:48 PM
- 736 Views
nope
15/02/2012 07:21:03 PM
- 627 Views
*Shrug*
15/02/2012 08:28:48 PM
- 752 Views
Re: *Shrug*
15/02/2012 09:07:24 PM
- 919 Views
No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 01:55:19 AM
- 697 Views
Re: No way they could pull off what you are talking about with current tech
16/02/2012 03:23:34 PM
- 638 Views
Re: It can not be directly effected by the OP
15/02/2012 02:37:40 AM
- 648 Views
Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 02:12:59 PM
- 620 Views
Re: Maybe, maybe not
15/02/2012 06:11:42 PM
- 762 Views
I'll happily amend my initial statement to "maybe even challeling ones"
15/02/2012 07:03:48 PM
- 657 Views
what a lot of people are forgetting with their suggestions of plate armor...
13/02/2012 02:36:50 PM
- 819 Views
Your understanding of how plate armor functions is in error
14/02/2012 01:45:37 PM
- 644 Views
I believe AND I was hoping you would go into the physics of it :p
14/02/2012 11:01:18 PM
- 631 Views