Active Users:558 Time:19/12/2024 02:49:14 PM
Re: Your theory is based on rather severely flawed assumptions Tor Send a noteboard - 05/02/2012 09:52:35 PM
There is no reason to think that the third-age channelers who became the Aes Sedai of the White Tower weren't simply the first - or strongest - group of wilders to coalesce out of the chaos of the Breaking. None of the most useful AoL weaves and techniques survived - travelling, five-power healing, inverting, dreamwalking, and so on - which strains credulity no matter how you try to explain it.


Of those things you mention, dreamwalking and five-power healing requires a special Talent, and inverting isn't particularly useful when fighting men, as they don't see what a woman does anyway. But otherwise, you are making my point, which is that it strains credulity that Travelling became lost.

At the same time, weaves and techniques were discovered that hadn't been known in the Age of Legends, things like the Warder bond, and unravelling. And it's rather patronising to assume that wilders simply couldn't achieve the control necessary to impress anyone. The Aiel, the Sea Folk and the Ayyad all independently developed channeling traditions and efficient methods of training.


Sure, but I don't see that happening in 98 years.

And, strong as she was, all the Tower's training didn't help young Cadsuane much against the wilder Norla, who had no one to teach her at all.


I'm not sure why you bring this up. Cadsuane likely didn't try to fight her, and in any case she had the ter'angreal that makes weaves dissolve, so she could have been completely useless with the power, and Cadsuane would still have listened to her if she seemed like an interesting person with a strong personality.

It also seems a mistake to judge all three millennia of Aes Sedai by those we see in the WoT books; modern AS are timid and frown on innovation, but past Aes Sedai tested ter'angreal like the Arches even when it could mean stilling or death, and must have put a great deal of work into creating the hundred testing weaves. Such innovation isn't the behaviour of women who think they know it all already; it's the behaviour of women who know well that there is a great deal more for them to learn.

It's my opinion that if weaves such as Travelling did manage to survive the breaking - which is doubtful but not impossible - they were finally lost when the new Third-Age Aes Sedai exterminated all the female channelers who refused to join the White Tower.


I guess that could be, but it doesn't seem very likely. It would be very bad luck if the only women who knew how to Travel were killed without trying to escape by Travelling, when many others joined the Aes Sedai.
Fram kamerater!
Reply to message
How did Travelling become a lost Talent? - 03/02/2012 09:09:39 AM 2076 Views
It is a little odd. Maybe because channelers weren't united for a while? - 03/02/2012 02:24:17 PM 999 Views
Re: How did Travelling become a lost Talent? - 03/02/2012 02:49:02 PM 838 Views
It has always seemed unlikely. - 03/02/2012 04:53:14 PM 907 Views
i think it could be - 03/02/2012 07:56:18 PM 1046 Views
Re: i think it could be - 04/02/2012 12:56:57 PM 973 Views
I'm really not seeing it. - 05/02/2012 04:19:38 AM 835 Views
It's always struck me as a tool of the Author more than a good hard fact - 04/02/2012 01:40:06 AM 690 Views
Your theory is based on rather severely flawed assumptions - 04/02/2012 07:34:45 AM 1086 Views
Re: Your theory is based on rather severely flawed assumptions - 04/02/2012 09:48:52 AM 903 Views
Re: Your theory is based on rather severely flawed assumptions - 04/02/2012 03:04:48 PM 934 Views
Re: Your theory is based on rather severely flawed assumptions - 04/02/2012 06:58:41 PM 816 Views
Re: Your theory is based on rather severely flawed assumptions - 05/02/2012 12:00:05 AM 833 Views
Re: Your theory is based on rather severely flawed assumptions - 05/02/2012 04:05:57 AM 755 Views
I don't see why people are having trouble believing Traveling was lost in the Breaking - 05/02/2012 05:53:32 PM 796 Views
not to mention - 05/02/2012 07:16:59 PM 755 Views
Re: not to mention - 05/02/2012 08:50:50 PM 1074 Views
Re: not to mention - 05/02/2012 09:33:40 PM 792 Views
Re: I don't see why people are having trouble believing Traveling was lost in the Breaking - 05/02/2012 07:39:51 PM 983 Views
Medical knowledge... - 06/02/2012 02:15:13 AM 685 Views
My point was that it's surprising only ONE Healing weave survived - 11/02/2012 08:25:02 PM 753 Views
Re: I don't see why people are having trouble believing Traveling was lost in the Breaking - 05/02/2012 09:11:04 PM 689 Views
Rant rant rant - 11/02/2012 08:26:56 PM 803 Views
I agree. I was going to respond but you covered most of the bases. - 08/02/2012 04:13:20 PM 681 Views
Re: Your theory is based on rather severely flawed assumptions - 05/02/2012 09:52:35 PM 856 Views
You really need to read the BWB sections regarding this - 14/02/2012 01:20:20 AM 676 Views
he needs to read it just to see it for his own eyes - 14/02/2012 02:46:44 AM 636 Views
Re: he needs to read it just to see it for his own eyes - 14/02/2012 10:15:46 PM 715 Views
I would agree with you on less structured parts of the series - 15/02/2012 03:38:37 PM 615 Views
Re: I would agree with you on less structured parts of the series - 16/02/2012 09:41:29 PM 768 Views
That I can agree with - 17/02/2012 05:46:49 AM 823 Views
Re: That I can agree with - 17/02/2012 09:26:50 AM 686 Views
Seriously! The Yellow should be ashamed - 17/02/2012 01:49:07 PM 831 Views
Well to be fair to the Yellow (which generally annoy me as an Ajah)... - 17/02/2012 06:20:06 PM 753 Views
Seems reasonable - 18/02/2012 05:49:40 PM 713 Views
Quote found - 12/02/2012 01:35:58 AM 640 Views
My thoughts - 05/02/2012 10:14:59 PM 873 Views
Re: How did Travelling become a lost Talent? - 13/02/2012 12:24:35 PM 812 Views
a few more other factors - 15/02/2012 08:22:02 PM 673 Views

Reply to Message